Campbell to Youngstown
Ohio municipal income tax, Chapter 718 framework · credit set by Campbell ordinance · tax year 2026
Work city takes
2.75%
Youngstown, on income earned there
Home city charges
2.5%
Campbell, residents
Credit back
$1,500
capped by the ceiling
Cost of the commute
$150
a year, above working at home
What it costs you
ceiling bindsCampbell's credit stops at its ceiling, so the rest of its own tax still applies. Solid is what you pay; the faded part of the Campbell bar is the credit it hands back. Municipal income tax only — state, federal and payroll tax apply on top, and an Ohio school district income tax may too.
What this commute actually costs
- There is a ceiling on this, and you have hit it. Campbell will credit tax paid to Youngstown, but only up to about 2.5% of what you earn. Past that point you pay Campbell too. The gap runs to $150 over a year, on top of $1,650 already withheld where you work.
- Youngstown draws workers from 3 places in this data, and Campbell is 3 of them by size, with about 570 people. It is a short list. Smaller routes into the city exist below the counting threshold.
- The credit here is real but bounded. Campbell allows residents about 100% of tax paid to another municipality, subject to a ceiling of about 2.5% of income, and on this pairing it is the ceiling rather than the share that binds. Youngstown withholds $1,650 at about 2.75%; Campbell returns $1,500 of that and collects the remainder of its own about 2.5% resident levy. The workplace accordingly costs $150 above the home-only position, against a total of $1,650.
- Youngstown records 3 qualifying commuting origins in this dataset, of which Campbell ranks 3 by worker count at approximately 570. A workplace of this size draws from a small enough set of origins that the comparison is indicative rather than statistical, and the published floor excludes an unknown tail of smaller flows.
Where the money goes
A $75,000 salary
- Federal income tax$7,670
- Social Security and Medicare$5,738
- State income tax$1,346
- Yours$60,246
| Federal income tax10.23% | $7,670 |
|---|---|
| Social Security and Medicare7.65% | $5,738 |
| State income tax1.79% | $1,346 |
| Yours80.33% | $60,246 |
The arithmetic, step by step
| Youngstown takes, on income earned there | $1,650 |
|---|---|
| Campbell charges residents | $1,500 |
| Less the credit Campbell gives back | $1,500 |
| Total local tax | $1,650 |
| If you also lived in Youngstown | $1,500 |
| Difference | $150 |
On a reference salary of $60,000 a year. Both rates and the credit ceiling are shares of income, so every figure scales with your own pay.
What this page does not cover
- Two guesses about this are wrong, and they miss in opposite directions. The rates are not added together. Nor do you simply pay whichever is higher, which is how it works across the border in Pennsylvania. Youngstown taxes what you earn there, Campbell taxes everything you earn, and then Campbell decides how much of the first bill to give back.
- The credit rule on this page belongs to Campbell, not to the state. Its council sets it and its council can change it. Nothing needs to happen in Youngstown or at the state level for these numbers to move. Check the current rule before you rely on it.
- This page covers city income tax only. Your school district may charge its own on top, and many in Ohio do. That one follows your address in Campbell rather than your workplace in Youngstown, and it is not credited against anything.
- These figures are the local layer alone. Whatever Campbell and Youngstown take sits on top of state, federal and payroll tax. Those three are the same wherever in Ohio you work, so putting them in would bury the difference this page is about.
- Every dollar amount here uses a salary of sixty thousand a year. It is a benchmark, not a guess at what people in Campbell earn, because nobody publishes average pay for single municipalities. Scale the figures to your own salary. The rates and the credit work the same way at any income, so the Youngstown conclusion holds.
- Two misreadings bracket the correct answer and both are common. Ohio does not simply add the two rates together, which would overstate the charge; nor does it apply only the higher of them, which is Pennsylvania's rule and would understate it wherever the credit is partial. Youngstown taxes what is earned within its boundaries, Campbell taxes its residents on everything, and Campbell then credits some, all or none of what Youngstown collected. The credit is the entire mechanism, and it is set by Campbell rather than by the state.
- The credit rule modeled here is Campbell's own, adopted by ordinance and amendable by Campbell alone. Ohio's uniform framework governs definitions, filing and withholding; it does not compel any municipality to credit tax paid to another. A council vote in Campbell can therefore change every figure on this page without anything altering in Youngstown or in state law, which is a materially different exposure from a rate set by statute.
- Ohio school district income tax is a separate levy from municipal income tax and is excluded from these figures. It is imposed by school district of residence rather than by municipality, it is unaffected by employment in Youngstown, and no municipal credit applies to it. A resident of Campbell whose school district levies one owes it in addition to everything shown here, which is why the totals on this page are a municipal position rather than a complete local one.
- Only municipal income tax is modeled. Ohio's state income tax, federal income tax and payroll taxes all apply in addition and are invariant to the boundary between Campbell and Youngstown, which is precisely why they are excluded: isolating the layer that responds to the commute is the point of the comparison. A complete tax position requires adding them; a comparison of the two locations does not.
- Dollar figures are computed against a stated reference salary of sixty thousand rather than a municipal wage average, which no published source provides for Ohio municipalities. Both rates and the credit ceiling are proportional to income, so every figure scales linearly: the Campbell to Youngstown differential doubles at twice the salary and halves at half of it, and the rate relationship holds at every level. The one caveat is that whether the ceiling binds at all is itself scale-invariant here, because it too is expressed as a share of income rather than as a fixed dollar cap.
Questions people ask
Do I pay local tax twice — once where I work and once where I live?
Two claims, one partly canceled. Youngstown takes about 2.75% because you work there, Campbell charges about 2.5% because you live there, and the home city credits some of the first against the second.
What does crossing this boundary actually cost me?
$150 a year more than if you worked where you live. It is not a commuting charge and it buys you nothing — it is what falls out of two jurisdictions both having a claim and only one of them yielding.
Is this commute common enough for the numbers to mean anything?
570 workers make this journey — enough to be published, but not a major corridor. The tax rules do not depend on how many people travel a route, so the figures hold regardless; the count only tells you how typical this pairing is.
How does a resident credit allocate liability between two municipalities?
Both jurisdictions assert a claim: Youngstown on the basis of work location at about 2.75%, Campbell on residence at about 2.5%. The residence municipality grants a credit for tax paid to the work municipality, commonly capped as a share of income. Net liability is the residence tax less that credit, floored at zero, plus the work tax.
What is the marginal local tax cost of this commute?
Marginal annual liability attributable to working outside the residence jurisdiction is $150 at the reference salary. This is a tax cost rather than a commuting expense and is not deductible as one. It scales with income and with the rate differential, not with distance traveled.
What is the measurement basis for a route of this size?
Route volume is 570 workers per Census LODES, above the publication floor but below the dataset's upper quartile. Liability is determined by jurisdictional rates and residence rules alone; commuter volume has no bearing on it and is reported only as context.