Macedonia to Cleveland

Everyday commuter cars and a bus crossing a steel river bridge beside an American city.

Ohio municipal income tax, Chapter 718 framework · credit set by Macedonia ordinance · tax year 2026

Work city takes

2.5%

Cleveland, on income earned there

Home city charges

2.5%

Macedonia, residents

Credit back

$1,500

a share of the work tax

Cost of the commute

$0

a year, above working at home

What it costs you

no extra local tax
$
Local tax total
$1,500
to both cities, for the year
Because of the commute
$0
above working in Macedonia
Credit returned
$1,500
a share of the work tax

Macedonia credits only part of what Cleveland takes, so the remainder is taxed twice. Solid is what you pay; the faded part of the Macedonia bar is the credit it hands back. Municipal income tax only — state, federal and payroll tax apply on top, and an Ohio school district income tax may too.

What this commute actually costs

  • Here is the good news. Working in Cleveland costs you nothing extra in local tax. Macedonia charges residents about 2.5%, and it credits back every dollar Cleveland collects from you. Either way your bill is $1,500 a year. What changes is which city keeps the money, not how much of it you hand over.
  • This one is balanced on a knife edge. What Cleveland takes is exactly what Macedonia is willing to credit — no more. It costs you nothing today. It would cost you from the very first dollar if either city moved its rate.
  • The run from Macedonia is one of 66 recorded commutes into Cleveland, and it comes 51 by the number of workers on it, about 1,126. Every one of those routes meets the same rate in Cleveland. What separates them is what each home city gives back.
  • This pairing is neutral to the worker. Cleveland withholds about 2.5% on income earned there, and Macedonia, which levies about 2.5% on residents, credits that payment in full without reaching its own ceiling. Liability at the reference salary is therefore $1,500 — precisely what the same earnings would attract with no commute at all. What the arrangement alters is the division of revenue between Cleveland and Macedonia, not the sum leaving the worker's pay.
  • This pairing sits exactly on its limit. Cleveland's rate and the ceiling Macedonia places on its credit coincide to the cent, so the credit absorbs the work-city tax precisely and not a dollar further. The commute is costless today and has no margin whatsoever: any increase by Cleveland, or any reduction in the ceiling by Macedonia, falls directly on the worker from the first dollar.
  • Cleveland is a major regional workplace, drawing recorded flows from 66 separate origins in this dataset. The route from Macedonia ranks 51 among them by worker count, at roughly 1,126. Rank is not a proxy for tax outcome: every origin faces the same Cleveland rate, and what differs between them is the home municipality's credit, so a smaller route can carry a considerably worse result than a larger one.

Where the money goes

A $75,000 salary

  • Federal income tax$7,670
  • Social Security and Medicare$5,738
  • State income tax$1,346
  • Yours$60,246
Federal income tax10.23%$7,670
Social Security and Medicare7.65%$5,738
State income tax1.79%$1,346
Yours80.33%$60,246

The arithmetic, step by step

Macedonia to Cleveland municipal tax breakdown
Cleveland takes, on income earned there$1,500
Macedonia charges residents$1,500
Less the credit Macedonia gives back$1,500
Total local tax$1,500
If you also lived in Cleveland$1,500
Difference$0

On a reference salary of $60,000 a year. Both rates and the credit ceiling are shares of income, so every figure scales with your own pay.

What this page does not cover

  • Two guesses about this are wrong, and they miss in opposite directions. The rates are not added together. Nor do you simply pay whichever is higher, which is how it works across the border in Pennsylvania. Cleveland taxes what you earn there, Macedonia taxes everything you earn, and then Macedonia decides how much of the first bill to give back.
  • The credit rule on this page belongs to Macedonia, not to the state. Its council sets it and its council can change it. Nothing needs to happen in Cleveland or at the state level for these numbers to move. Check the current rule before you rely on it.
  • This page covers city income tax only. Your school district may charge its own on top, and many in Ohio do. That one follows your address in Macedonia rather than your workplace in Cleveland, and it is not credited against anything.
  • Do not read this as your whole tax bill. It is the part that answers to the commute between Macedonia and Cleveland. State and federal tax carry on regardless, unchanged by which side of a city line your desk is on.
  • Every dollar amount here uses a salary of sixty thousand a year. It is a benchmark, not a guess at what people in Macedonia earn, because nobody publishes average pay for single municipalities. Scale the figures to your own salary. The rates and the credit work the same way at any income, so the Cleveland conclusion holds.
  • Two misreadings bracket the correct answer and both are common. Ohio does not simply add the two rates together, which would overstate the charge; nor does it apply only the higher of them, which is Pennsylvania's rule and would understate it wherever the credit is partial. Cleveland taxes what is earned within its boundaries, Macedonia taxes its residents on everything, and Macedonia then credits some, all or none of what Cleveland collected. The credit is the entire mechanism, and it is set by Macedonia rather than by the state.
  • The credit rule modeled here is Macedonia's own, adopted by ordinance and amendable by Macedonia alone. Ohio's uniform framework governs definitions, filing and withholding; it does not compel any municipality to credit tax paid to another. A council vote in Macedonia can therefore change every figure on this page without anything altering in Cleveland or in state law, which is a materially different exposure from a rate set by statute.
  • Ohio school district income tax is a separate levy from municipal income tax and is excluded from these figures. It is imposed by school district of residence rather than by municipality, it is unaffected by employment in Cleveland, and no municipal credit applies to it. A resident of Macedonia whose school district levies one owes it in addition to everything shown here, which is why the totals on this page are a municipal position rather than a complete local one.
  • Only municipal income tax is modeled. Ohio's state income tax, federal income tax and payroll taxes all apply in addition and are invariant to the boundary between Macedonia and Cleveland, which is precisely why they are excluded: isolating the layer that responds to the commute is the point of the comparison. A complete tax position requires adding them; a comparison of the two locations does not.
  • Dollar figures are computed against a stated reference salary of sixty thousand rather than a municipal wage average, which no published source provides for Ohio municipalities. Both rates and the credit ceiling are proportional to income, so every figure scales linearly: the Macedonia to Cleveland differential doubles at twice the salary and halves at half of it, and the rate relationship holds at every level. The one caveat is that whether the ceiling binds at all is itself scale-invariant here, because it too is expressed as a share of income rather than as a fixed dollar cap.

Questions people ask

Do I pay local tax twice — once where I work and once where I live?

Two claims, one partly canceled. Cleveland takes about 2.5% because you work there, Macedonia charges about 2.5% because you live there, and the home city credits some of the first against the second.

Does working in a different town cost me anything?

On this route, nothing. You owe exactly what you would have owed working at home — the boundary is real on a map and invisible on your pay stub, which is not true of every pair of towns here.

Is this a common enough commute to be worth modeling?

Yes — 1,126 people make this exact journey, according to the federal employment survey that tracks where workers live against where they work. Routes below a volume floor are not published, so a page existing here means the commute is real and measured.

Both towns charge the same — does the boundary matter at all then?

Not to your total. Macedonia and Cleveland both levy about 2.5%, so the amount is settled either way — what the boundary decides is which authority receives it, and that is an accounting question rather than a cost to you.

How does a resident credit allocate liability between two municipalities?

Both jurisdictions assert a claim: Cleveland on the basis of work location at about 2.5%, Macedonia on residence at about 2.5%. The residence municipality grants a credit for tax paid to the work municipality, commonly capped as a share of income. Net liability is the residence tax less that credit, floored at zero, plus the work tax.

Why is the marginal cost of this crossing zero?

Marginal liability from working outside the residence jurisdiction is zero on this route. The crossing alters the distribution of revenue between jurisdictions but not the employee's total. ⚠️ This is route-specific and does not generalise to other pairs in the same dataset.

What is the basis for including this route?

Route volume is 1,126 workers, sourced from Census LODES origin-destination data. Pairs below the publication threshold are excluded rather than imputed, so page existence reflects measured commuting volume.

What is the effect of identical rates either side of the boundary?

Both jurisdictions levy about 2.5%, so the governing rate is identical regardless of which rule allocates it. The boundary affects revenue attribution between authorities, not employee liability.