Piqua to Troy
Ohio municipal income tax, Chapter 718 framework · credit set by Piqua ordinance · tax year 2026
Work city takes
1.75%
Troy, on income earned there
Home city charges
2%
Piqua, residents
Credit back
$1,050
a share of the work tax
Cost of the commute
$0
a year, above working at home
What it costs you
no extra local taxPiqua credits only part of what Troy takes, so the remainder is taxed twice. Solid is what you pay; the faded part of the Piqua bar is the credit it hands back. Municipal income tax only — state, federal and payroll tax apply on top, and an Ohio school district income tax may too.
What this commute actually costs
- Some Ohio commutes cost you real money. This one does not. Piqua gives full credit for the tax Troy takes out of your pay, so the two settle down to the same bill you would owe at home. On sixty thousand that is $1,200 for the year. The commute shifts money between city halls and leaves your total alone.
- This is closer than it looks. Piqua covers what Troy takes, but only up to a limit, and Troy is $150 a year short of it. Raise the work rate past that and the commute stops being free.
- Piqua is the biggest single source of workers for Troy. Around 1,185 people make the trip, ahead of every other origin the data records, 2 in all. That is why this pairing is worth setting out rather than leaving people to work out alone.
- This pairing is neutral to the worker. Troy withholds about 1.75% on income earned there, and Piqua, which levies about 2% on residents, credits that payment in full without reaching its own ceiling. Liability at the reference salary is therefore $1,200 — precisely what the same earnings would attract with no commute at all. What the arrangement alters is the division of revenue between Troy and Piqua, not the sum leaving the worker's pay.
- The margin is worth knowing, because it is not large. Piqua credits tax paid to Troy only up to a ceiling set as a share of income, and Troy's levy currently sits below it with $150 of annual room to spare at the reference salary. Were Troy to raise its rate past that point, the excess would cease to be credited and would fall on the worker rather than on either treasury.
- This is the largest recorded flow into Troy. Of 2 origins feeding that workplace in this dataset, Piqua supplies the most workers at approximately 1,185. The credit outcome described above therefore applies to more commuters than any other single route into the city, which matters when the outcome is an adverse one: the same ordinance governs every origin, but the populations behind each are very different.
Where the money goes
A $75,000 salary
- Federal income tax$7,670
- Social Security and Medicare$5,738
- State income tax$1,346
- Yours$60,246
| Federal income tax10.23% | $7,670 |
|---|---|
| Social Security and Medicare7.65% | $5,738 |
| State income tax1.79% | $1,346 |
| Yours80.33% | $60,246 |
The arithmetic, step by step
| Troy takes, on income earned there | $1,050 |
|---|---|
| Piqua charges residents | $1,200 |
| Less the credit Piqua gives back | $1,050 |
| Total local tax | $1,200 |
| If you also lived in Troy | $1,200 |
| Difference | $0 |
On a reference salary of $60,000 a year. Both rates and the credit ceiling are shares of income, so every figure scales with your own pay.
What this page does not cover
- Do not add the two rates up, and do not assume the bigger one simply wins. Neither is how Ohio works. Both Troy and Piqua charge you. Piqua may then hand back what Troy took, or part of it, or none of it. Everything on this page turns on which of those it does.
- The credit rule on this page belongs to Piqua, not to the state. Its council sets it and its council can change it. Nothing needs to happen in Troy or at the state level for these numbers to move. Check the current rule before you rely on it.
- Ohio has a second local tax that is not on this page. Some school districts levy their own income tax. It depends on where you live, not on your job in Troy, and the credit from Piqua does not touch it. If your district charges one, add it to everything here.
- Do not read this as your whole tax bill. It is the part that answers to the commute between Piqua and Troy. State and federal tax carry on regardless, unchanged by which side of a city line your desk is on.
- Every dollar amount here uses a salary of sixty thousand a year. It is a benchmark, not a guess at what people in Piqua earn, because nobody publishes average pay for single municipalities. Scale the figures to your own salary. The rates and the credit work the same way at any income, so the Troy conclusion holds.
- Two misreadings bracket the correct answer and both are common. Ohio does not simply add the two rates together, which would overstate the charge; nor does it apply only the higher of them, which is Pennsylvania's rule and would understate it wherever the credit is partial. Troy taxes what is earned within its boundaries, Piqua taxes its residents on everything, and Piqua then credits some, all or none of what Troy collected. The credit is the entire mechanism, and it is set by Piqua rather than by the state.
- The credit rule modeled here is Piqua's own, adopted by ordinance and amendable by Piqua alone. Ohio's uniform framework governs definitions, filing and withholding; it does not compel any municipality to credit tax paid to another. A council vote in Piqua can therefore change every figure on this page without anything altering in Troy or in state law, which is a materially different exposure from a rate set by statute.
- Ohio school district income tax is a separate levy from municipal income tax and is excluded from these figures. It is imposed by school district of residence rather than by municipality, it is unaffected by employment in Troy, and no municipal credit applies to it. A resident of Piqua whose school district levies one owes it in addition to everything shown here, which is why the totals on this page are a municipal position rather than a complete local one.
- Only municipal income tax is modeled. Ohio's state income tax, federal income tax and payroll taxes all apply in addition and are invariant to the boundary between Piqua and Troy, which is precisely why they are excluded: isolating the layer that responds to the commute is the point of the comparison. A complete tax position requires adding them; a comparison of the two locations does not.
- Dollar figures are computed against a stated reference salary of sixty thousand rather than a municipal wage average, which no published source provides for Ohio municipalities. Both rates and the credit ceiling are proportional to income, so every figure scales linearly: the Piqua to Troy differential doubles at twice the salary and halves at half of it, and the rate relationship holds at every level. The one caveat is that whether the ceiling binds at all is itself scale-invariant here, because it too is expressed as a share of income rather than as a fixed dollar cap.
Questions people ask
Do I pay local tax twice — once where I work and once where I live?
Both places charge you, but the city you live in gives back some of what the other one took. Troy taxes you for working there at about 1.75%; Piqua then charges its own about 2% and credits part of the first against it. Whether anything is left over depends on how generous that credit is.
Does working in a different town cost me anything?
Nothing extra. The tax is redirected rather than increased, so this particular crossing costs you no more than working in Piqua would.
Is this a common enough commute to be worth modeling?
Yes — 1,185 people make this exact journey, according to the federal employment survey that tracks where workers live against where they work. Routes below a volume floor are not published, so a page existing here means the commute is real and measured.
How does a resident credit allocate liability between two municipalities?
Both jurisdictions assert a claim: Troy on the basis of work location at about 1.75%, Piqua on residence at about 2%. The residence municipality grants a credit for tax paid to the work municipality, commonly capped as a share of income. Net liability is the residence tax less that credit, floored at zero, plus the work tax.
Why is the marginal cost of this crossing zero?
Marginal liability from working outside the residence jurisdiction is zero on this route. The crossing alters the distribution of revenue between jurisdictions but not the employee's total. ⚠️ This is route-specific and does not generalise to other pairs in the same dataset.
What is the basis for including this route?
Route volume is 1,185 workers, sourced from Census LODES origin-destination data. Pairs below the publication threshold are excluded rather than imputed, so page existence reflects measured commuting volume.