Strongsville to Parma
Ohio municipal income tax, Chapter 718 framework · credit set by Strongsville ordinance · tax year 2026
Work city takes
2.5%
Parma, on income earned there
Home city charges
2%
Strongsville, residents
Credit back
$1,125
a share of the work tax
Cost of the commute
$375
a year, above working at home
What it costs you
partial creditStrongsville credits only part of what Parma takes, so the remainder is taxed twice. Solid is what you pay; the faded part of the Strongsville bar is the credit it hands back. Municipal income tax only — state, federal and payroll tax apply on top, and an Ohio school district income tax may too.
What this commute actually costs
- Read your own city's rule closely, because Strongsville does not credit in full. It allows about 75% of the tax Parma has already collected. Anything above that share you pay again at home. The commute adds $375 to the year, bringing local tax to $1,575.
- Parma draws workers from 4 places in this data, and Strongsville is 4 of them by size, with about 720 people. It is a short list. Smaller routes into the city exist below the counting threshold.
- Strongsville credits only part of what its residents pay elsewhere. Its ordinance allows about 75% of tax paid to another municipality, and on this pairing that share, rather than the income ceiling, is what limits the relief. Against $1,500 withheld by Parma, the credit returns $1,125, leaving Strongsville to collect the balance of its about 2% resident levy. The workplace accounts for $375; the year's local total is $1,575.
- Parma records 4 qualifying commuting origins in this dataset, of which Strongsville ranks 4 by worker count at approximately 720. A workplace of this size draws from a small enough set of origins that the comparison is indicative rather than statistical, and the published floor excludes an unknown tail of smaller flows.
Where the money goes
A $75,000 salary
- Federal income tax$7,670
- Social Security and Medicare$5,738
- State income tax$1,346
- Yours$60,246
| Federal income tax10.23% | $7,670 |
|---|---|
| Social Security and Medicare7.65% | $5,738 |
| State income tax1.79% | $1,346 |
| Yours80.33% | $60,246 |
The arithmetic, step by step
| Parma takes, on income earned there | $1,500 |
|---|---|
| Strongsville charges residents | $1,200 |
| Less the credit Strongsville gives back | $1,125 |
| Total local tax | $1,575 |
| If you also lived in Parma | $1,200 |
| Difference | $375 |
On a reference salary of $60,000 a year. Both rates and the credit ceiling are shares of income, so every figure scales with your own pay.
What this page does not cover
- Two guesses about this are wrong, and they miss in opposite directions. The rates are not added together. Nor do you simply pay whichever is higher, which is how it works across the border in Pennsylvania. Parma taxes what you earn there, Strongsville taxes everything you earn, and then Strongsville decides how much of the first bill to give back.
- The credit rule on this page belongs to Strongsville, not to the state. Its council sets it and its council can change it. Nothing needs to happen in Parma or at the state level for these numbers to move. Check the current rule before you rely on it.
- This page covers city income tax only. Your school district may charge its own on top, and many in Ohio do. That one follows your address in Strongsville rather than your workplace in Parma, and it is not credited against anything.
- These figures are the local layer alone. Whatever Strongsville and Parma take sits on top of state, federal and payroll tax. Those three are the same wherever in Ohio you work, so putting them in would bury the difference this page is about.
- Every dollar amount here uses a salary of sixty thousand a year. It is a benchmark, not a guess at what people in Strongsville earn, because nobody publishes average pay for single municipalities. Scale the figures to your own salary. The rates and the credit work the same way at any income, so the Parma conclusion holds.
- Two misreadings bracket the correct answer and both are common. Ohio does not simply add the two rates together, which would overstate the charge; nor does it apply only the higher of them, which is Pennsylvania's rule and would understate it wherever the credit is partial. Parma taxes what is earned within its boundaries, Strongsville taxes its residents on everything, and Strongsville then credits some, all or none of what Parma collected. The credit is the entire mechanism, and it is set by Strongsville rather than by the state.
- The credit rule modeled here is Strongsville's own, adopted by ordinance and amendable by Strongsville alone. Ohio's uniform framework governs definitions, filing and withholding; it does not compel any municipality to credit tax paid to another. A council vote in Strongsville can therefore change every figure on this page without anything altering in Parma or in state law, which is a materially different exposure from a rate set by statute.
- Ohio school district income tax is a separate levy from municipal income tax and is excluded from these figures. It is imposed by school district of residence rather than by municipality, it is unaffected by employment in Parma, and no municipal credit applies to it. A resident of Strongsville whose school district levies one owes it in addition to everything shown here, which is why the totals on this page are a municipal position rather than a complete local one.
- Only municipal income tax is modeled. Ohio's state income tax, federal income tax and payroll taxes all apply in addition and are invariant to the boundary between Strongsville and Parma, which is precisely why they are excluded: isolating the layer that responds to the commute is the point of the comparison. A complete tax position requires adding them; a comparison of the two locations does not.
- Dollar figures are computed against a stated reference salary of sixty thousand rather than a municipal wage average, which no published source provides for Ohio municipalities. Both rates and the credit ceiling are proportional to income, so every figure scales linearly: the Strongsville to Parma differential doubles at twice the salary and halves at half of it, and the rate relationship holds at every level. The one caveat is that whether the ceiling binds at all is itself scale-invariant here, because it too is expressed as a share of income rather than as a fixed dollar cap.
Questions people ask
Do I pay local tax twice — once where I work and once where I live?
You are taxed by both, then given credit for one. Working in Parma costs about 2.5%; living in Strongsville costs about 2%, reduced by whatever share of the work tax the home city recognizes.
What does crossing this boundary actually cost me?
$375 a year more than if you worked where you live. It is not a commuting charge and it buys you nothing — it is what falls out of two jurisdictions both having a claim and only one of them yielding.
Why does my home town not credit the whole of what the other one took?
Full credit would mean Strongsville collecting nothing from anyone who works out of town. Councils rarely do that, and the shortfall is what a commuter pays.
Is this commute common enough for the numbers to mean anything?
720 workers make this journey — enough to be published, but not a major corridor. The tax rules do not depend on how many people travel a route, so the figures hold regardless; the count only tells you how typical this pairing is.
How does a resident credit allocate liability between two municipalities?
Both jurisdictions assert a claim: Parma on the basis of work location at about 2.5%, Strongsville on residence at about 2%. The residence municipality grants a credit for tax paid to the work municipality, commonly capped as a share of income. Net liability is the residence tax less that credit, floored at zero, plus the work tax.
What is the marginal local tax cost of this commute?
Marginal annual liability attributable to working outside the residence jurisdiction is $375 at the reference salary. This is a tax cost rather than a commuting expense and is not deductible as one. It scales with income and with the rate differential, not with distance traveled.
Why is the residence credit less than the full work-district tax?
Credit rates and ceilings are set by the residence municipality, not by state law. A full credit would forgo residence-based revenue from every outbound commuter, so credits are commonly partial or capped as a share of income. The uncredited remainder is the commuter's marginal cost.
What is the measurement basis for a route of this size?
Route volume is 720 workers per Census LODES, above the publication floor but below the dataset's upper quartile. Liability is determined by jurisdictional rates and residence rules alone; commuter volume has no bearing on it and is reported only as context.