Manheim Township to East Hempfield Township

Everyday commuter cars and a bus crossing a steel river bridge beside an American city.

Pennsylvania Act 32 local earned income tax · LANCASTER to LANCASTER County · tax year 2026

Home rate

1%

Manheim Township, residents

Work rate

1%

East Hempfield Township, non-residents

You pay

1%

the higher of the two

Cost of the commute

$0

a year, above the home rate

What this commute costs you

no extra local tax
$
Local tax total
$600
one rate, not two, for the year
Because of the commute
$0
above working in Manheim Township
Slack before it costs
$0
East Hempfield Township could take this much more first

The two rates are identical, so the test is a wash — but this pair sits exactly at the line, and any rise in East Hempfield Township's commuter rate would start costing you. You pay the solid bar only — Pennsylvania charges the higher of the two rates, never their sum. Local earned income tax only; state, federal and payroll tax apply on top.

What this commute actually costs

  • Live in Manheim Township, work in East Hempfield Township, and your local tax is your home rate: about 1%. That is $600 a year on a sixty-thousand salary. The work location adds nothing. Pennsylvania charges whichever rate is higher, and yours already is.
  • Manheim Township is one of 5 places sending workers into East Hempfield Township, ranking 2 by size with about 1,205 commuters. It is Manheim Township's 2 destination of 3.
  • Residence controls this pairing: Manheim Township levies about 1% on residents, at or above East Hempfield Township's non-resident rate, so the outcome is the resident rate — about 1%, or $600 at the reference salary. Employers still withhold against the work location's collector, but the amount is unchanged and the residence is the ultimate recipient.
  • Across 5 inflows to East Hempfield Township tracked here, Manheim Township ranks 2 at 1,205 workers, and this is that municipality's 2 destination of 3. Rate and volume are independent: a large catchment is not necessarily a high-rate one, and the two rankings frequently disagree.

Where the money goes

A $75,000 salary

  • Federal income tax$7,670
  • Social Security and Medicare$5,738
  • State income tax$2,303
  • Yours$59,290
Federal income tax10.23%$7,670
Social Security and Medicare7.65%$5,738
State income tax3.07%$2,303
Yours79.05%$59,290

The arithmetic, side by side

Manheim Township to East Hempfield Township rate comparison
If you worked in Manheim Township$600
Working in East Hempfield Township$600
Difference$0

On a reference salary of $60,000 a year. The local tax is flat, so every figure scales with your own pay.

What this page does not cover

  • A common worry, answered. You do not pay Manheim Township and East Hempfield Township both. Only one rate applies, the higher of the two. The two councils then sort out between themselves who gets what, and your bill is unaffected.
  • Everything here is the local earned income tax and nothing else. State income tax applies on top, as do federal tax and Social Security. None of those change when you cross a municipal line between Manheim Township and East Hempfield Township. This page is about the layer that does.
  • The dollar figures use a flat reference salary of sixty thousand a year. That is a benchmark, not an average for Manheim Township. No wage data exists for single municipalities, and inventing one would be worse. Scale the numbers to your own pay. The rate for the East Hempfield Township commute is what matters, and it does not change with income.
  • Two practical cautions. Postal addresses and taxing boundaries do not always agree. Your post may say Manheim Township while your taxing municipality is a different one. Pennsylvania publishes an official lookup to settle it. The same caution applies at the East Hempfield Township end. Philadelphia is a special case too, with its own wage tax.
  • Workers commuting from Manheim Township to East Hempfield Township are subject to one rate, not two. The statute directs the employer to withhold the greater of the resident and non-resident rates; the allocation between the two taxing bodies is a remittance mechanic invisible to the employee. Treating the two rates as cumulative is the most common misreading of the statute.
  • Figures cover the local earned income tax exclusively. Pennsylvania's flat state income tax, federal income tax and FICA apply in addition and are invariant to the Manheim Township–East Hempfield Township municipal boundary, which is precisely why they are excluded: isolating the layer that responds to the commute is the point of the comparison.
  • Dollar amounts are computed against a stated reference salary rather than a municipal wage average, which does not exist for Pennsylvania municipalities in any published source. Because the local tax is flat, the rate is invariant to income and the figures scale linearly — the Manheim Township to East Hempfield Township differential doubles at twice the salary and halves at half of it.
  • Two caveats bear on accuracy. First, postal addresses and municipal taxing boundaries diverge frequently in Pennsylvania, so a Manheim Township address should be confirmed against the DCED municipal lookup before relying on the Manheim Township rate. Second, Philadelphia administers its wage tax outside this framework, with its own resident and non-resident rates and its own credit arrangements, so any pairing touching it should be checked against the city's own schedule.

Questions people ask

Do I pay local tax twice — once where I work and once where I live?

No — you pay the higher of the two rates and never the sum. Manheim Township levies about 1% on residents and East Hempfield Township levies about 1% on people who work there; whichever is larger is what you owe, and your employer withholds it.

Does working in a different town cost me anything?

On this route, nothing. You owe exactly what you would have owed working at home — the boundary is real on a map and invisible on your pay stub, which is not true of every pair of towns here.

Which town's rate am I actually paying?

Manheim Township's, because it is the higher of the two. Where you live sets the rate on this route, so working across the boundary does not raise what you owe — it only changes who collects it.

Is this a common enough commute to be worth modeling?

1,205 workers make it. The pairing comes from federal commuting data rather than from guesswork, and thin routes are excluded rather than estimated.

Both towns charge the same — does the boundary matter at all then?

Not to your total. Manheim Township and East Hempfield Township both levy about 1%, so the amount is settled either way — what the boundary decides is which authority receives it, and that is an accounting question rather than a cost to you.

How does Pennsylvania's local earned income tax law allocate liability between two districts?

Pennsylvania's local earned income tax law assigns the higher of the residence rate (about 1%) and the non-resident work rate (about 1%); liabilities are never summed. The employer withholds at the governing rate and remits through the work district's collector, which then distributes to the residence district.

Why is the marginal cost of this crossing zero?

Marginal liability from working outside the residence jurisdiction is zero on this route. The crossing alters the distribution of revenue between jurisdictions but not the employee's total. ⚠️ This is route-specific and does not generalise to other pairs in the same dataset.

Which district's rate governs on this route?

The residence rate equals or exceeds the work district's non-resident rate and therefore governs. Working outside the residence district does not increase employee liability on this route; it affects only inter-district distribution.

What is the basis for including this route?

Route volume is 1,205 workers, sourced from Census LODES origin-destination data. Pairs below the publication threshold are excluded rather than imputed, so page existence reflects measured commuting volume.

What is the effect of identical rates either side of the boundary?

Both jurisdictions levy about 1%, so the governing rate is identical regardless of which rule allocates it. The boundary affects revenue attribution between authorities, not employee liability.