North Versailles Township to Pittsburgh

Everyday commuter cars and a bus crossing a steel river bridge beside an American city.

Pennsylvania Act 32 local earned income tax · ALLEGHENY to ALLEGHENY County · tax year 2026

Home rate

1%

North Versailles Township, residents

Work rate

1%

Pittsburgh, non-residents

You pay

1%

the higher of the two

Cost of the commute

$0

a year, above the home rate

What this commute costs you

no extra local tax
$
Local tax total
$600
one rate, not two, for the year
Because of the commute
$0
above working in North Versailles Township
Slack before it costs
$0
Pittsburgh could take this much more first

The two rates are identical, so the test is a wash — but this pair sits exactly at the line, and any rise in Pittsburgh's commuter rate would start costing you. You pay the solid bar only — Pennsylvania charges the higher of the two rates, never their sum. Local earned income tax only; state, federal and payroll tax apply on top.

What this commute actually costs

  • Good news for this commute. Working in Pittsburgh costs you nothing extra. North Versailles Township charges residents about 1%, at least as much as Pittsburgh asks of people who work there but live elsewhere. The higher rate wins, so your home rate is simply the rate. That is $600 a year, wherever you work.
  • North Versailles Township is one of 85 places sending workers into Pittsburgh, ranking 48 by size with about 1,105 commuters. It is North Versailles Township's 1 destination of 1.
  • For the North Versailles Township to Pittsburgh commute the residence governs. North Versailles Township's resident rate of about 1% equals or exceeds Pittsburgh's non-resident rate, so Pennsylvania's greater-of test resolves to the resident rate and the effective burden is about 1%, or $600 at the reference salary. The workplace adds nothing; the entire amount is remitted to the residence. This is the majority outcome and the one most commuters need confirmed.
  • Across 85 inflows to Pittsburgh tracked here, North Versailles Township ranks 48 at 1,105 workers, and this is that municipality's 1 destination of 1. Rate and volume are independent: a large catchment is not necessarily a high-rate one, and the two rankings frequently disagree.

Where the money goes

A $75,000 salary

  • Federal income tax$7,670
  • Social Security and Medicare$5,738
  • State income tax$2,303
  • Yours$59,290
Federal income tax10.23%$7,670
Social Security and Medicare7.65%$5,738
State income tax3.07%$2,303
Yours79.05%$59,290

The arithmetic, side by side

North Versailles Township to Pittsburgh rate comparison
If you worked in North Versailles Township$600
Working in Pittsburgh$600
Difference$0

On a reference salary of $60,000 a year. The local tax is flat, so every figure scales with your own pay.

What this page does not cover

  • To be explicit, since the arrangement invites confusion. The rates for North Versailles Township and Pittsburgh are not stacked. Pennsylvania takes the larger one. What is collected then gets divided between the two municipalities. That division does not change what comes out of your pay.
  • Only one tax is on this page. It is the local earned income tax that North Versailles Township and Pittsburgh levy. State tax, federal tax and Social Security all still apply. All three are the same wherever in Pennsylvania you work.
  • All the dollar amounts rest on one assumed salary. It is stated rather than measured, because nobody publishes average pay for North Versailles Township. The local tax is a flat percentage. Scale every figure to your own salary and the Pittsburgh conclusion holds.
  • Two practical cautions. Postal addresses and taxing boundaries do not always agree. Your post may say North Versailles Township while your taxing municipality is a different one. Pennsylvania publishes an official lookup to settle it. The same caution applies at the Pittsburgh end. Philadelphia is a special case too, with its own wage tax.
  • The two rates applicable to a North Versailles Township–Pittsburgh commute are alternatives, not addends. The statute fixes the employee's liability at the greater of them and then apportions the proceeds, with the residence receiving up to its own rate and the excess passing to the work location. The apportionment is fiscally significant to the municipalities and immaterial to the worker.
  • The scope here is the municipal earned income tax alone. State, federal and payroll taxes are unaffected by the choice between North Versailles Township and Pittsburgh and are therefore outside the model. A total tax position requires adding them; a comparison of the two locations does not.
  • Monetary figures derive from a single stated salary assumption; no published wage series covers Pennsylvania municipalities such as North Versailles Township. The flat structure of the local tax means the Pittsburgh comparison is scale-invariant, so the rate difference rather than the dollar difference is the transferable result.
  • Two caveats bear on accuracy. First, postal addresses and municipal taxing boundaries diverge frequently in Pennsylvania, so a North Versailles Township address should be confirmed against the DCED municipal lookup before relying on the North Versailles Township rate. Second, Philadelphia administers its wage tax outside this framework, with its own resident and non-resident rates and its own credit arrangements, so any pairing touching it should be checked against the city's own schedule.

Questions people ask

Do I pay local tax twice — once where I work and once where I live?

No — you pay the higher of the two rates and never the sum. North Versailles Township levies about 1% on residents and Pittsburgh levies about 1% on people who work there; whichever is larger is what you owe, and your employer withholds it.

Does working in a different town cost me anything?

Nothing extra. The tax is redirected rather than increased, so this particular crossing costs you no more than working in North Versailles Township would.

Which town's rate am I actually paying?

The one where you live. North Versailles Township levies at least as much as Pittsburgh, so its rate applies and the crossing costs you nothing extra.

Is this a common enough commute to be worth modeling?

It is. 1,105 workers travel this pair, per the federal origin-destination survey; smaller routes fall below the publication floor and get no page.

Both towns charge the same — does the boundary matter at all then?

Not for what you pay. Both sides charge about 1%; the line only determines who banks it.

How does Pennsylvania's local earned income tax law allocate liability between two districts?

Pennsylvania's local earned income tax law assigns the higher of the residence rate (about 1%) and the non-resident work rate (about 1%); liabilities are never summed. The employer withholds at the governing rate and remits through the work district's collector, which then distributes to the residence district.

Why is the marginal cost of this crossing zero?

Marginal liability from working outside the residence jurisdiction is zero on this route. The crossing alters the distribution of revenue between jurisdictions but not the employee's total. ⚠️ This is route-specific and does not generalise to other pairs in the same dataset.

Which district's rate governs on this route?

The residence rate equals or exceeds the work district's non-resident rate and therefore governs. Working outside the residence district does not increase employee liability on this route; it affects only inter-district distribution.

What is the basis for including this route?

Route volume is 1,105 workers, sourced from Census LODES origin-destination data. Pairs below the publication threshold are excluded rather than imputed, so page existence reflects measured commuting volume.

What is the effect of identical rates either side of the boundary?

Both jurisdictions levy about 1%, so the governing rate is identical regardless of which rule allocates it. The boundary affects revenue attribution between authorities, not employee liability.