Philadelphia to Radnor Township

Everyday commuter cars and a bus crossing a steel river bridge beside an American city.

Pennsylvania Act 32 local earned income tax · PHILADELPHIA to DELAWARE County · tax year 2026

Home rate

3.74%

Philadelphia, residents

Work rate

0%

Radnor Township, non-residents

You pay

3.74%

the higher of the two

Cost of the commute

$0

a year, above the home rate

What this commute costs you

no extra local tax
$
Local tax total
$2,244
one rate, not two, for the year
Because of the commute
$0
above working in Philadelphia
Slack before it costs
$2,244
Radnor Township could take this much more first

Philadelphia already charges its residents more than Radnor Township charges commuters, so the home rate governs and the job adds nothing at all. You pay the solid bar only — Pennsylvania charges the higher of the two rates, never their sum. Local earned income tax only; state, federal and payroll tax apply on top.

What this commute actually costs

  • Nothing changes for this commute. A resident of Philadelphia pays about 3.74% either way. It makes no difference whether they work at home or travel to Radnor Township. The home rate is the higher of the two, and the higher one wins. That is $2,244 a year.
  • This is one of 69 places Philadelphia residents commute to, ranking 35 by size. Few routes into Radnor Township are recorded, so there is little to compare at that end.
  • The Philadelphia to Radnor Township commute is tax-neutral. Philadelphia's resident rate of about 3.74% is not exceeded by Radnor Township's non-resident rate, so under the state's rule the resident rate applies and the effective figure is about 3.74% — $2,244 annually at the reference salary. Withholding is remitted to the residence in full and the work location receives no share.
  • Among 69 destinations recorded for Philadelphia, Radnor Township ranks 35 by worker count. The destination side carries too few recorded inflows for a meaningful comparison across origins, so the origin-side position is the more informative one here.

Where the money goes

A $75,000 salary

  • Federal income tax$7,670
  • Social Security and Medicare$5,738
  • State income tax$2,303
  • Yours$59,290
Federal income tax10.23%$7,670
Social Security and Medicare7.65%$5,738
State income tax3.07%$2,303
Yours79.05%$59,290

The arithmetic, side by side

Philadelphia to Radnor Township rate comparison
If you worked in Philadelphia$2,244
Working in Radnor Township$2,244
Difference$0

On a reference salary of $60,000 a year. The local tax is flat, so every figure scales with your own pay.

What this page does not cover

  • To be explicit, since the arrangement invites confusion. The rates for Philadelphia and Radnor Township are not stacked. Pennsylvania takes the larger one. What is collected then gets divided between the two municipalities. That division does not change what comes out of your pay.
  • This covers the local tax only. Whatever Philadelphia or Radnor Township takes sits on top of state tax, federal tax and Social Security. Those three do not care where you live or work.
  • Sixty thousand a year is a benchmark. It is not a guess at what people in Philadelphia earn. No published wage figure exists for single municipalities. The rate is the durable part of this page. The dollars scale straight up and down with whatever you earn in Radnor Township.
  • Two practical cautions. Postal addresses and taxing boundaries do not always agree. Your post may say Philadelphia while your taxing municipality is a different one. Pennsylvania publishes an official lookup to settle it. The same caution applies at the Radnor Township end. Philadelphia is a special case too, with its own wage tax.
  • The two rates applicable to a Philadelphia–Radnor Township commute are alternatives, not addends. The statute fixes the employee's liability at the greater of them and then apportions the proceeds, with the residence receiving up to its own rate and the excess passing to the work location. The apportionment is fiscally significant to the municipalities and immaterial to the worker.
  • Only the local earned income tax component is modeled for the Philadelphia to Radnor Township commute. State and federal liabilities are constant across Pennsylvania municipalities and are excluded so the municipal differential is visible rather than buried inside a larger total.
  • The reference salary is a stated benchmark, not an estimate of Philadelphia earnings, for which no municipal-level published source exists. The local earned income tax is proportional, so all dollar figures for the Radnor Township commute scale linearly with income and the rate comparison holds at every salary.
  • Two caveats bear on accuracy. First, postal addresses and municipal taxing boundaries diverge frequently in Pennsylvania, so a Philadelphia address should be confirmed against the DCED municipal lookup before relying on the Philadelphia rate. Second, Philadelphia administers its wage tax outside this framework, with its own resident and non-resident rates and its own credit arrangements, so any pairing touching it should be checked against the city's own schedule.

Questions people ask

Do I pay local tax twice — once where I work and once where I live?

No — you pay the higher of the two rates and never the sum. Philadelphia levies about 3.74% on residents and Radnor Township levies about 0% on people who work there; whichever is larger is what you owe, and your employer withholds it.

Does working in a different town cost me anything?

Not a cent on this one. The crossing changes where the money is sent, not how much of it leaves, so your total matches a stay-at-home commute.

Which town's rate am I actually paying?

The one where you live. Philadelphia levies at least as much as Radnor Township, so its rate applies and the crossing costs you nothing extra.

Is this a common enough commute to be worth modeling?

Yes — 1,157 people make this exact journey, according to the federal employment survey that tracks where workers live against where they work. Routes below a volume floor are not published, so a page existing here means the commute is real and measured.

The town I work in charges nothing — does that help me?

Not really. Radnor Township levies nothing on people who work there, but Philadelphia still charges its residents about 3.74% — and residence is the claim that does not go away when you cross a line to work.

How does Pennsylvania's local earned income tax law allocate liability between two districts?

Pennsylvania's local earned income tax law assigns the higher of the residence rate (about 3.74%) and the non-resident work rate (about 0%); liabilities are never summed. The employer withholds at the governing rate and remits through the work district's collector, which then distributes to the residence district.

Why is the marginal cost of this crossing zero?

Marginal liability from working outside the residence jurisdiction is zero on this route. The crossing alters the distribution of revenue between jurisdictions but not the employee's total. ⚠️ This is route-specific and does not generalise to other pairs in the same dataset.

Which district's rate governs on this route?

The residence rate equals or exceeds the work district's non-resident rate and therefore governs. Working outside the residence district does not increase employee liability on this route; it affects only inter-district distribution.

What is the basis for including this route?

Route volume is 1,157 workers, sourced from Census LODES origin-destination data. Pairs below the publication threshold are excluded rather than imputed, so page existence reflects measured commuting volume.

What is the effect of a zero work-district rate?

A zero work-district rate eliminates the source-based claim but leaves residence-based liability intact at about 3.74%. Residence liability is unaffected by where earnings are sourced.