Plymouth Township to Philadelphia

Everyday commuter cars and a bus crossing a steel river bridge beside an American city.

Pennsylvania Act 32 local earned income tax · LUZERNE to PHILADELPHIA County · tax year 2026

Home rate

2%

Plymouth Township, residents

Work rate

3.43%

Philadelphia, non-residents

You pay

3.43%

the higher of the two

Cost of the commute

$858

a year, above the home rate

What this commute costs you

workplace governs
$
Local tax total
$2,058
one rate, not two, for the year
Because of the commute
$858
above working in Plymouth Township
Philadelphia keeps
$858
the rest goes to Plymouth Township

Philadelphia charges commuters more than Plymouth Township charges its own residents, so the work rate wins the greater-of test and the difference is real money. You pay the solid bar only — Pennsylvania charges the higher of the two rates, never their sum. Local earned income tax only; state, federal and payroll tax apply on top.

What this commute actually costs

  • Where you work costs more than where you live here. Plymouth Township charges residents about 2%. Philadelphia charges non-residents about 3.43%. You pay the higher one. That is $2,058 a year, or $858 more than working at home would cost.
  • Roughly 1,282 people commute from Plymouth Township to Philadelphia, which makes this route number 36 out of 94 tracked into that workplace. A normal-sized flow rather than a dominant one.
  • On the Plymouth Township to Philadelphia commute the work location governs. Plymouth Township's resident rate is about 2% and Philadelphia's non-resident rate is about 3.43%; Pennsylvania's greater-of test therefore fixes the effective rate at about 3.43%. At the reference salary that is $2,058, of which $858 is attributable to the workplace. The residence collects its own rate and the excess is remitted to the work location.
  • This flow carries 1,282 workers, ranking 36 among 94 recorded routes into Philadelphia and 1 of 1 destinations recorded for Plymouth Township. The rate outcome above therefore applies to a meaningful but not dominant share of that workplace's inbound commuters.

Where the money goes

A $75,000 salary

  • Federal income tax$7,670
  • Social Security and Medicare$5,738
  • State income tax$2,303
  • Yours$59,290
Federal income tax10.23%$7,670
Social Security and Medicare7.65%$5,738
State income tax3.07%$2,303
Yours79.05%$59,290

The arithmetic, side by side

Plymouth Township to Philadelphia rate comparison
If you worked in Plymouth Township$1,200
Working in Philadelphia$2,058
Difference$858

On a reference salary of $60,000 a year. The local tax is flat, so every figure scales with your own pay.

What this page does not cover

  • One thing worth being clear about, because it catches people out. You are not charged by both places. Plymouth Township and Philadelphia do not add their rates together. Pennsylvania picks the higher of the two, and that is what you pay. Adding them would roughly double the bill.
  • This covers the local tax only. Whatever Plymouth Township or Philadelphia takes sits on top of state tax, federal tax and Social Security. Those three do not care where you live or work.
  • The dollar figures use a flat reference salary of sixty thousand a year. That is a benchmark, not an average for Plymouth Township. No wage data exists for single municipalities, and inventing one would be worse. Scale the numbers to your own pay. The rate for the Philadelphia commute is what matters, and it does not change with income.
  • A postal address in Plymouth Township does not prove which municipality taxes you. Boundaries and postcodes disagree often enough here that the state publishes a lookup. Philadelphia is a special case too. Its wage tax sits outside the rules that govern Philadelphia.
  • Pennsylvania's local rule is a greater-of rule, not an additive one: the liability for a Plymouth Township resident working in Philadelphia is the higher of the two applicable rates, not their sum. The distinction is worth stating plainly because the additive reading is intuitive and would overstate the charge by roughly a factor of two. What is divided between the municipalities is the remittance, not the worker's liability.
  • Only the local earned income tax component is modeled for the Plymouth Township to Philadelphia commute. State and federal liabilities are constant across Pennsylvania municipalities and are excluded so the municipal differential is visible rather than buried inside a larger total.
  • Dollar amounts are computed against a stated reference salary rather than a municipal wage average, which does not exist for Pennsylvania municipalities in any published source. Because the local tax is flat, the rate is invariant to income and the figures scale linearly — the Plymouth Township to Philadelphia differential doubles at twice the salary and halves at half of it.
  • Municipal taxing jurisdiction is determined by boundary rather than by postal address, and the two diverge frequently enough in Pennsylvania that the DCED lookup should be treated as authoritative for Plymouth Township. Philadelphia is additionally outside this regime, administering its own wage tax on residents and non-residents under separate authority, so it does not follow the treatment described for Philadelphia.

Questions people ask

Do I pay local tax twice — once where I work and once where I live?

Only once, at the higher rate. Between Plymouth Township's about 2% and Philadelphia's about 3.43%, the larger governs — the two are never added together.

What does crossing this boundary actually cost me?

$858 a year more than if you worked where you live. It is not a commuting charge and it buys you nothing — it is what falls out of two jurisdictions both having a claim and only one of them yielding.

Which town's rate am I actually paying?

Philadelphia's, because it is the higher of the two. Where you work sets the rate on this route, and your home town receives its share out of what is collected rather than charging you separately.

Is this a common enough commute to be worth modeling?

Yes — 1,282 people make this exact journey, according to the federal employment survey that tracks where workers live against where they work. Routes below a volume floor are not published, so a page existing here means the commute is real and measured.

How does Pennsylvania's local earned income tax law allocate liability between two districts?

Pennsylvania's local earned income tax law assigns the higher of the residence rate (about 2%) and the non-resident work rate (about 3.43%); liabilities are never summed. The employer withholds at the governing rate and remits through the work district's collector, which then distributes to the residence district.

What is the marginal local tax cost of this commute?

Marginal annual liability attributable to working outside the residence jurisdiction is $858 at the reference salary. This is a tax cost rather than a commuting expense and is not deductible as one. It scales with income and with the rate differential, not with distance traveled.

Which district's rate governs on this route?

The work district's non-resident rate exceeds the residence rate and therefore governs. Withholding occurs at that rate, and distribution between the two districts happens after collection without further employee liability.

What is the basis for including this route?

Route volume is 1,282 workers, sourced from Census LODES origin-destination data. Pairs below the publication threshold are excluded rather than imputed, so page existence reflects measured commuting volume.