Clinical and Counseling Psychologists in New Hampshire
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$53,821
after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax
Tax takes
$10,449
16.3% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$51,090
New Hampshire costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in New Hampshire — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$64,270
Kept after tax
$53,821
Worth in national money
$51,090
State rank
48
of 48 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- The nominal figure here is modest. New Hampshire pays this job a middle wage of $64,270, 48 of 48 states and about 36.1% below the national middle. Hold that thought until the adjusted numbers.
- Middle of the local pack. Of 488 occupations New Hampshire reports figures for, this is number 221.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $64,270 the take-home is $53,821. But New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $51,090 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $98,030, because the best-paid pull it up.
- New Hampshire's $64,270 median for clinical and counseling psychologists places it 48 of 48 states, about 36.1% below national. Because both the tax and price adjustments tend to favor lower-nominal states, this ranking is the least stable of the three reported here.
- In New Hampshire's occupational distribution, clinical and counseling psychologists sits at 221 of 488 — neither quartile. This local position is what a resident compares against, and it is determined by the state's own labor market rather than by national patterns for this occupation.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and New Hampshire income tax is $53,821 for clinical and counseling psychologists, from $64,270. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $51,090. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $98,030 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Clinical and Counseling Psychologists
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $44,550 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $64,270 |
| Top tenth earn over | $194,050 |
| This salary | $64,270 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in New Hampshire | $53,821 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $53,821 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$4,295 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $64,270 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$5,195 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 105 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Treat $64,270 as a midpoint for New Hampshire, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $44,550 and the ninetieth is $194,050 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
- One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind New Hampshire's $53,821, worked from $64,270. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 221 of 488.
- One number stands for prices across all of New Hampshire, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $51,090, the adjusted value of that $64,270 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 221 of 488 in the state.
- The New Hampshire median of $64,270 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $44,550 to $194,050. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
- The New Hampshire take-home of $53,821, on $64,270 for work ranking 221 of 488 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 221 of 488 in the state.
- Price deflation uses one statewide parity for New Hampshire, so $51,090 — the adjusted value of that $64,270 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 221 of 488 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $98,030, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
The label is broader than the work. From $44,550 at the bottom tenth to $194,050 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
Not on its own. Prices in New Hampshire run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $51,090 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $53,821 survives, because New Hampshire levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Why is this job missing from some states?
Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 48 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in New Hampshire is $98,030. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($44,550) and the ninetieth ($194,050) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $51,090 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $53,821 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 48 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.