Paramedics in New Hampshire

A stethoscope and folded scrubs in a sunlit clinical workspace.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$53,773

after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax

Tax takes

$10,437

16.3% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$51,044

New Hampshire costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$64,210

Kept after tax

$53,773

Worth in national money

$51,044

State rank

15

of 51 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • This is a good state for the work. New Hampshire pays paramedics a middle wage of $64,210, ranking 15 of 51 states and sitting about 5.96% above the national middle.
  • Against other work in New Hampshire, this sits in the middle: 223 of 488 occupations with published pay. Solidly ordinary for the state, which is not the same as ordinary nationally.
  • The wage here flatters the reality. From $64,210 the take-home is $53,773. But New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $51,044 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $66,840, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • New Hampshire's median for paramedics is $64,210, about 5.96% above the national figure and 15 of 51 states reporting. Whether that premium reaches the worker depends on the two adjustments below, which is the part a wage table cannot tell you.
  • Paramedics ranks 223 of 488 occupations in New Hampshire by median pay, in the middle bands. Within-state and national positions are separate measurements and a job commonly sits in different quartiles on each.
  • Retained pay after federal, FICA and New Hampshire income tax is $53,773 for paramedics, from $64,210. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $51,044. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $66,840 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Paramedics

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$53,180
Half earn under$64,210
Top tenth earn over$79,370
This salary$64,210

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in New Hampshire$53,773
Take-home in Texas$53,773
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$4,292

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $64,210$59,020
$59,020in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$64,210
You could take a cut of−$5,190
Prices in Texas97 vs 105

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $64,210 as a midpoint for New Hampshire, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $53,180 and the ninetieth is $79,370 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • In New Hampshire the take-home figure of $53,773, from $64,210, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 223 of 488 occupations here.
  • One number stands for prices across all of New Hampshire, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $51,044, the adjusted value of that $64,210 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 223 of 488 in the state.
  • The New Hampshire median of $64,210 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $53,180 to $79,370. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • Take-home for New Hampshire is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $53,773 from $64,210. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 223 of 488 locally.
  • Price deflation uses one statewide parity for New Hampshire, so $51,044 — the adjusted value of that $64,210 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 223 of 488 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $66,840, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.

How much does pay for this job actually vary?

The range here is narrow. From $53,180 at the bottom tenth to $79,370 at the top, pay for this work clusters rather than spreads.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

The number and the value are different things. New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $51,044 rather than its face figure.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

No. $53,773 survives, because New Hampshire levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.

Can I compare this job across every state?

Yes for this one. Pay is published in all 51 jurisdictions, so a state-to-state comparison here rests on the same survey everywhere rather than on a patchwork.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in New Hampshire is $66,840. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?

The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($53,180 to $79,370) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to New Hampshire rather than a national figure.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $51,044 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $53,773 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Is this occupation's state coverage complete?

State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.