Compensation and Benefits Managers in Idaho

A person arriving at a home office with a bag beside a laptop and navy coffee cup.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$68,241

after federal, FICA and Idaho tax

Tax takes

$21,779

24.2% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$74,642

Idaho costs less than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$90,020

Kept after tax

$68,241

Worth in national money

$74,642

State rank

44

of 45 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • The nominal figure here is modest. Idaho pays this job a middle wage of $90,020, 44 of 45 states and about 39.68% below the national middle. Hold that thought until the adjusted numbers.
  • Within Idaho this is well-paid work. Of 476 occupations with published figures in the state, this job ranks 79 — in the top quarter of everything people do there.
  • Here is where Idaho does better than its wage suggests. From a median of $90,020 you keep $68,241, and because things cost less here than the national average, that behaves like $74,642 would elsewhere. The average is higher, $113,490, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • Idaho's $90,020 median for compensation and benefits managers places it 44 of 45 states, about 39.68% below national. Because both the tax and price adjustments tend to favor lower-nominal states, this ranking is the least stable of the three reported here.
  • Ranked against every occupation Idaho publishes a median for, compensation and benefits managers sits 79 of 476 — the upper quartile of the state's wage distribution. National standing and within-state standing are separate questions, and a job can occupy very different positions on each.
  • After federal, FICA and Idaho income tax, retained pay for compensation and benefits managers on $90,020 is $68,241. Deflating by the state's price level — below the national average — gives $74,642 in national-average terms. ⚠️ That figure is purchasing power, not a wage, and nobody is paid it; it is what the take-home buys. The mean of $113,490 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Compensation and Benefits Managers

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$83,710
Half earn under$90,020
Top tenth earn over$199,990
This salary$90,020

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$3,918take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Idaho$68,241
Take-home in Texas$72,159
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity−$385

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0$90,552
$90,552in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$84,451
Raise you would need+$532
Prices in Texas97 vs 91

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of compensation and benefits managers in Idaho earn under $90,020 and half over. The published range runs $83,710 at the tenth percentile to $199,990 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Idaho's $68,241, worked from $90,020. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 79 of 476.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $74,642 uses one figure for the whole of Idaho. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 476 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 79.
  • Figures are distribution medians for compensation and benefits managers in Idaho, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $83,710 to $199,990; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • The Idaho take-home of $68,241, on $90,020 for work ranking 79 of 476 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 79 of 476 in the state.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $74,642, worked from $90,020, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Idaho address, on work sitting at 79 of 476 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $113,490 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $83,710 and the top tenth $199,990 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.

What does this pay actually buy where I live?

Further than the number implies. Idaho is cheaper than the national average, so this take-home behaves like $74,642 in national terms.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Into four separate taxes, not one. Federal income tax, Social Security and Medicare apply everywhere, and Idaho adds its own income tax on top — which is why $68,241 of this wage survives to your account.

Why is this job missing from some states?

A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 45 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Idaho is $113,490. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($83,710) and the ninetieth ($199,990) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?

Idaho's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $74,642 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $68,241 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Idaho income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 45 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.