Compensation and Benefits Managers in Texas

A person arriving at a home office with a bag beside a laptop and navy coffee cup.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$104,858

after federal, FICA and Texas tax

Tax takes

$32,072

23.4% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$107,906

Texas costs less than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$136,930

Kept after tax

$104,858

Worth in national money

$107,906

State rank

21

of 45 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Texas sits in the middle of the pack for this job. The median is $136,930, ranking 21 of 45 states with figures. Close enough to the national middle that where you live matters more than the headline suggests.
  • Within Texas this is well-paid work. Of 493 occupations with published figures in the state, this job ranks 16 — in the top quarter of everything people do there.
  • Cost of living is unremarkable here. From $136,930, tax leaves $104,858, and adjusting for local prices barely moves it — about $107,906 in comparable terms. Averages run higher here, $148,610, since top earners drag the number up.
  • Texas occupies the middle band for compensation and benefits managers: a median of $136,930, ranking 21 of 45. Where nominal pay is close to the national figure, the tax and price adjustments below carry proportionally more weight in determining the real outcome.
  • Ranked against every occupation Texas publishes a median for, compensation and benefits managers sits 16 of 493 — the upper quartile of the state's wage distribution. National standing and within-state standing are separate questions, and a job can occupy very different positions on each.
  • Because Texas sits close to the national price level, the real-terms figure for compensation and benefits managers — median $136,930 — tracks the post-tax figure closely: $104,858 retained, $107,906 adjusted. ⚠️ Neither is a wage; the second describes what the first buys. Mean pay of $148,610 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Compensation and Benefits Managers

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$86,550
Half earn under$136,930
Top tenth earn over$216,890
This salary$136,930

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Florida
Take-home in Texas$104,858
Take-home in Florida$104,858
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity−$6,547

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0$146,840
$146,840in Florida, for the same life
To match take-home only$136,930
Raise you would need+$9,910
Prices in Florida103 vs 97

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of compensation and benefits managers in Texas earn under $136,930 and half over. The published range runs $86,550 at the tenth percentile to $216,890 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • In Texas the take-home figure of $104,858, from $136,930, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 16 of 493 occupations here.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $107,906 uses one figure for the whole of Texas. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 493 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 16.
  • Figures are distribution medians for compensation and benefits managers in Texas, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $86,550 to $216,890; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • Take-home for Texas is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $104,858 from $136,930. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 16 of 493 locally.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $107,906, worked from $136,930, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Texas address, on work sitting at 16 of 493 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $148,610, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $86,550 and the top tenth $216,890 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.

What does this pay actually buy where I live?

A smaller wage in a cheaper place is not automatically less. Adjusted for local prices, this is worth $107,906.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

No. $104,858 survives, because Texas levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.

Why is this job missing from some states?

The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 45 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Texas is $148,610. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($86,550) and the ninetieth ($216,890) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?

Texas's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $107,906 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

Texas levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $104,858 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 45 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.