Computer Systems Analysts in South Dakota

A computer workspace with headphones, a laptop and a small circuit board.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$79,032

after federal, FICA and South Dakota tax

Tax takes

$20,758

20.8% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$89,713

South Dakota costs less than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$99,790

Kept after tax

$79,032

Worth in national money

$89,713

State rank

30

of 50 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • South Dakota sits in the middle of the pack for computer systems analysts. The median is $99,790, ranking 30 of 50 states with figures. Close enough to the national middle that where you live matters more than the headline suggests.
  • Locally, this pays well. Among 457 occupations South Dakota reports, computer systems analysts comes in at 39 — comfortably in the upper quarter.
  • Cheaper living works in this state's favor. From $99,790 you keep $79,032 after tax, and local prices stretch that to the equivalent of $89,713 at national prices. Averages run higher here, $106,040, since top earners drag the number up.
  • South Dakota occupies the middle band for computer systems analysts: a median of $99,790, ranking 30 of 50. Where nominal pay is close to the national figure, the tax and price adjustments below carry proportionally more weight in determining the real outcome.
  • Computer systems analysts ranks 39 of 457 occupations by median in South Dakota, in the top quartile. Within-state position is largely independent of national position, so this holds regardless of how the state compares to others for the same work.
  • Retained pay in South Dakota is $79,032 after the full tax stack, from $99,790. Because the state's price level runs below the national average, the price-adjusted equivalent is $89,713 — a real-terms figure describing purchasing power rather than compensation, and not a number that appears on any pay stub. Mean pay of $106,040 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Computer Systems Analysts

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$66,710
Half earn under$99,790
Top tenth earn over$156,170
This salary$99,790

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in South Dakota$79,032
Take-home in Texas$79,032
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity−$8,383

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0$111,369
$111,369in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$99,790
Raise you would need+$11,579
Prices in Texas97 vs 88

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of computer systems analysts in South Dakota earn under $99,790 and half over. The published range runs $66,710 at the tenth percentile to $156,170 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • In South Dakota the take-home figure of $79,032, from $99,790, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 39 of 457 occupations here.
  • One number stands for prices across all of South Dakota, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $89,713, the adjusted value of that $99,790 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 39 of 457 in the state.
  • Figures are distribution medians for computer systems analysts in South Dakota, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $66,710 to $156,170; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • Take-home for South Dakota is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $79,032 from $99,790. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 39 of 457 locally.
  • Price deflation uses one statewide parity for South Dakota, so $89,713 — the adjusted value of that $99,790 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 39 of 457 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $106,040 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

The label is broader than the work. From $66,710 at the bottom tenth to $156,170 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.

What does this pay actually buy where I live?

Further than the number implies. South Dakota is cheaper than the national average, so this take-home behaves like $89,713 in national terms.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

No. $79,032 survives, because South Dakota levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.

Why is this job missing from some states?

The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 50 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in South Dakota is $106,040. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($66,710) and the ninetieth ($156,170) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?

South Dakota's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $89,713 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

South Dakota levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $79,032 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.