Construction and Building Inspectors in Washington
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$76,464
after federal, FICA and Washington tax
Tax takes
$19,676
20.5% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$70,434
Washington costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Washington — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$96,140
Kept after tax
$76,464
Worth in national money
$70,434
State rank
4
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Washington is one of the better-paying states for construction and building inspectors. The middle earner takes $96,140, which ranks 4 of 51 states with published figures. That is about 28.72% above the national middle.
- Against other work in Washington, this sits in the middle: 141 of 493 occupations with published pay. Solidly ordinary for the state, which is not the same as ordinary nationally.
- Washington is an expensive state, and the adjusted figure shows it. From $96,140 the take-home is $76,464; in national-average money that behaves like $70,434. The average lands at $93,070, below the middle of the range.
- Washington ranks 4 of 51 states publishing a median for construction and building inspectors, at $96,140 — about 28.72% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
- Construction and building inspectors ranks 141 of 493 occupations in Washington by median pay, in the middle bands. Within-state and national positions are separate measurements and a job commonly sits in different quartiles on each.
- Take-home for construction and building inspectors in Washington, on $96,140, is $76,464; deflated by the state's price level, $70,434. ⚠️ The deflator is statewide, so it understates the erosion in the state's metropolitan areas and overstates it outside them. At $93,070 the mean undershoots the median, an inversion of the usual skew.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Construction and Building Inspectors
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $63,840 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $96,140 |
| Top tenth earn over | $121,700 |
| This salary | $96,140 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Washington | $76,464 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $76,464 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$8,253 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $96,140 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$11,401 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 109 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Treat $96,140 as a midpoint for Washington, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $63,840 and the ninetieth is $121,700 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
- That $76,464 take-home in Washington comes from $96,140. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 141 of 493.
- Two cautions on $70,434, the adjusted value of that $96,140 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Washington. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 141 of 493 locally.
- The Washington median of $96,140 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $63,840 to $121,700. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
- Retained pay of $76,464, from $96,140, assumes a single Washington filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 141 of 493 locally, and the state ranks 4 of 51 for it.
- This $70,434 adjusted figure, worked from $96,140, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 141 of 493 in the state. The occupation ranks 141 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $93,070, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
Most of these jobs pay within a close range — $63,840 at the tenth percentile, $121,700 at the ninetieth.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. Washington costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $70,434 rather than its face figure.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $76,464 survives, because Washington levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Can I compare this job across every state?
Yes for this one. Pay is published in all 51 jurisdictions, so a state-to-state comparison here rests on the same survey everywhere rather than on a patchwork.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $93,070. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($63,840 to $121,700) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Washington rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $70,434 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $76,464 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.