Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary in Montana

Books, colored pencils and a globe in a bright classroom.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$75,648

after federal, FICA and Montana tax

Tax takes

$25,522

25.2% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$83,826

Montana costs less than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$101,170

Kept after tax

$75,648

Worth in national money

$83,826

State rank

39

of 48 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Montana is among the lower-paying states for this job. The middle earner takes $101,170, ranking 39 of 48 states — about 7.41% below the national middle. Costs here are often lower too, which the figures further down account for.
  • Locally, this pays well. Among 475 occupations Montana reports, this job comes in at 39 — comfortably in the upper quarter.
  • Montana is cheaper than average, and that shows up here. From $101,170 the take-home is $75,648; adjusted for what things actually cost, it goes as far as $83,826 would nationally. The average comes to $116,000, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
  • Montana ranks 39 of 48 for engineering teachers, postsecondary, with a median of $101,170 — about 7.41% below the national figure. A nominal shortfall is not by itself a real one: lower-paying states frequently carry lower tax and lower price levels, and the adjusted figures below are where that is settled rather than assumed.
  • Engineering teachers, postsecondary ranks 39 of 475 occupations by median in Montana, in the top quartile. Within-state position is largely independent of national position, so this holds regardless of how the state compares to others for the same work.
  • Post-tax income for engineering teachers, postsecondary in Montana, on $101,170, is $75,648 — equivalent to $83,826 once regional price parity is applied. ⚠️ The adjustment uses a statewide index that describes no particular address; within-state price variation, concentrated in housing, routinely exceeds the difference between two states. At $116,000 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$62,810
Half earn under$101,170
Top tenth earn over$167,470
This salary$101,170

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$4,355take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Montana$75,648
Take-home in Texas$80,003
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity−$1,497

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0$103,238
$103,238in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$94,979
Raise you would need+$2,068
Prices in Texas97 vs 90

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $101,170 as a midpoint for Montana, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $62,810 and the ninetieth is $167,470 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • That $75,648 take-home in Montana comes from $101,170. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 39 of 475.
  • Two cautions on $83,826, the adjusted value of that $101,170 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Montana. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 39 of 475 locally.
  • The Montana median of $101,170 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $62,810 to $167,470. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • Retained pay of $75,648, from $101,170, assumes a single Montana filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 39 of 475 locally, and the state ranks 39 of 48 for it.
  • This $83,826 adjusted figure, worked from $101,170, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 39 of 475 in the state. The occupation ranks 39 of 475 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $116,000, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

One title, many jobs. The lowest tenth take $62,810, the highest tenth $167,470, and what separates them is experience, employer and what exactly the role does.

What does this pay actually buy where I live?

A smaller wage in a cheaper place is not automatically less. Adjusted for local prices, this is worth $83,826.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Four deductions, stacked. The federal layer and the two payroll taxes apply wherever you work; Montana then takes its own share, leaving $75,648.

Why is this job missing from some states?

Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 48 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Montana is $116,000. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($62,810) and the ninetieth ($167,470) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?

Montana's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $83,826 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $75,648 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Montana income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 48 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.