Executive Secretaries and Executive Administrative Assistants in Washington

A person arriving at a home office with a bag beside a laptop and navy coffee cup.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$64,582

after federal, FICA and Washington tax

Tax takes

$14,668

18.5% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$59,489

Washington costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$79,250

Kept after tax

$64,582

Worth in national money

$59,489

State rank

9

of 51 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Pay for this job is strong here. Washington's middle earner gets $79,250, putting the state 9 of 51 — about 3.47% ahead of the national figure.
  • Against other work in Washington, this sits in the middle: 202 of 493 occupations with published pay. Solidly ordinary for the state, which is not the same as ordinary nationally.
  • The wage here flatters the reality. From $79,250 the take-home is $64,582. But Washington costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $59,489 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $82,020, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • For executive secretaries and executive administrative assistants, Washington sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $79,250, ranking 9 of 51 and running about 3.47% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
  • Executive secretaries and executive administrative assistants ranks 202 of 493 occupations in Washington by median pay, in the middle bands. Within-state and national positions are separate measurements and a job commonly sits in different quartiles on each.
  • Retained pay after federal, FICA and Washington income tax is $64,582 for executive secretaries and executive administrative assistants, from $79,250. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $59,489. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $82,020 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Executive Secretaries and Executive Administrative Assistants

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$59,810
Half earn under$79,250
Top tenth earn over$106,720
This salary$79,250

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Washington$64,582
Take-home in Texas$64,582
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$6,971

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $79,250$69,621
$69,621in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$79,250
You could take a cut of−$9,629
Prices in Texas97 vs 109

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Half the people doing this work in Washington earn less than $79,250. The published range is $59,810 up to $106,720, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
  • That $64,582 take-home in Washington comes from $79,250. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 202 of 493.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $59,489 uses one figure for the whole of Washington. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 493 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 202.
  • Reported values are medians; for executive secretaries and executive administrative assistants in Washington the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $59,810 to $106,720. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
  • Retained pay of $64,582, from $79,250, assumes a single Washington filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 202 of 493 locally, and the state ranks 9 of 51 for it.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $59,489, worked from $79,250, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Washington address, on work sitting at 202 of 493 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $82,020, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.

How much does pay for this job actually vary?

Less than you might expect. The bottom tenth earn $59,810 and the top tenth $106,720, so most people doing this work in Washington sit within a fairly tight band.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

The number and the value are different things. Washington costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $59,489 rather than its face figure.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

Most of it arrives. $64,582 lands after tax, since there is no state income tax on wages here — though the federal floor is identical in every state.

Can I compare this job across every state?

All 51 jurisdictions report this work, which makes the ranking a like-for-like one.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $82,020. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?

The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($59,810 to $106,720) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Washington rather than a national figure.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $59,489 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $64,582 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Is this occupation's state coverage complete?

State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.