First-Line Supervisors of Protective Service Workers, All Other in Washington
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$64,596
after federal, FICA and Washington tax
Tax takes
$14,674
18.5% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$59,502
Washington costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Washington — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$79,270
Kept after tax
$64,596
Worth in national money
$59,502
State rank
14
of 50 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Washington is one of the better-paying states for this job. The middle earner takes $79,270, which ranks 14 of 50 states with published figures. That is about 3.76% above the national middle.
- Against other work in Washington, this sits in the middle: 201 of 493 occupations with published pay. Solidly ordinary for the state, which is not the same as ordinary nationally.
- Washington is an expensive state, and the adjusted figure shows it. From $79,270 the take-home is $64,596; in national-average money that behaves like $59,502. The average comes to $80,900, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
- Washington ranks 14 of 50 states publishing a median for first-line supervisors of protective service workers, all other, at $79,270 — about 3.76% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
- First-line supervisors of protective service workers, all other ranks 201 of 493 occupations in Washington by median pay, in the middle bands. Within-state and national positions are separate measurements and a job commonly sits in different quartiles on each.
- Take-home for first-line supervisors of protective service workers, all other in Washington, on $79,270, is $64,596; deflated by the state's price level, $59,502. ⚠️ The deflator is statewide, so it understates the erosion in the state's metropolitan areas and overstates it outside them. At $80,900 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: First-Line Supervisors of Protective Service Workers, All Other
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $59,060 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $79,270 |
| Top tenth earn over | $102,480 |
| This salary | $79,270 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Washington | $64,596 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $64,596 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$6,972 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $79,270 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$9,631 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 109 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of first-line supervisors of protective service workers, all other in Washington earn under $79,270 and half over. The published range runs $59,060 at the tenth percentile to $102,480 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- In Washington the take-home figure of $64,596, from $79,270, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 201 of 493 occupations here.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $59,502 uses one figure for the whole of Washington. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 493 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 201.
- Figures are distribution medians for first-line supervisors of protective service workers, all other in Washington, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $59,060 to $102,480; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Take-home for Washington is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $64,596 from $79,270. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 201 of 493 locally.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $59,502, worked from $79,270, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Washington address, on work sitting at 201 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
Most of these jobs pay within a close range — $59,060 at the tenth percentile, $102,480 at the ninetieth.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
Not on its own. Prices in Washington run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $59,502 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Less than people assume. $64,596 of this wage reaches your account, because Washington takes no income tax from wages — but federal tax, Social Security and Medicare still apply exactly as they do everywhere else.
Why is this job missing from some states?
A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 50 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($59,060 to $102,480) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Washington rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $59,502 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $64,596 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.