Floral Designers

What the pay figures show
- Alaska pays floral designers the most, at $48,130. Unusually, it stays on top. Tax does not overturn it. Nor do local prices — it is still first at $40,164 once levelled out. That is rarer than it sounds. For most jobs the leader changes.
- Alaska leads for floral designers at $48,130 and retains the position through both adjustments, finishing first at $40,164 in price-deflated terms. That robustness is the minority case: across the largest occupations, state income tax reorders the leader roughly a third of the time and price level does so more often still. Where the nominal leader survives both, the wage premium is large enough to absorb the state's own tax and price levels.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay by state · May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
National median
$37,360
People doing it
40,590
Highest paid
$48,130
AK
Best off, really
$40,164
AK, after tax and prices
Lowest tenth
$28,600
Highest tenth
$51,000
Lowest, really
$28,291
MS
States with data
51
National average
$39,520
mean, not median
Prices where it goes furthest
101.72%
AK, against a national 100
Where this job actually pays best
- The state you work in changes what this job pays, but less than you would expect. Level out tax and prices and the whole country sits between $28,291 and $40,164. That is a real difference. It is not usually a moving-house difference.
- Only 40,590 people do this job in the whole country. It is a small field, so the pay figures rest on fewer reports.
- Every state reports this one. All 51 jurisdictions publish a figure, and the middle wage is $37,360, so the comparison above leaves nobody out.
- Interstate variation for floral designers is contained relative to other occupations, and narrows further under adjustment: the real range is $28,291 to $40,164. A differential of this magnitude is real but rarely decisive on its own, which is worth stating plainly against wage tables that present nominal gaps without either adjustment.
- National employment in floral designers is 40,590. ⚠️ At this headcount the state-level medians rest on comparatively thin samples, and year-to-year movement in any one state reflects sampling as much as wages.
- All 51 jurisdictions publish an occupational median for floral designers, so the spread described above is a complete national range rather than a range across a reported subset.
Pay band: Floral Designers
The national median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $28,600 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $37,360 |
| Top tenth earn over | $51,000 |
| This salary | $37,360 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
Where these numbers come from
| BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), May 2025 estimates, time-series bulk download (oe.data.0.Current) | as of 2025-05-01 |
|---|
Steps in Floral Designers
The national median for this job
| Lowest tenth | $28,600 |
|---|---|
| Middle | $37,360 |
| Top tenth | $51,000 |
The five points BLS publishes. Nothing between them is invented.
Floral Designers, state by state
The national median for this job
| Lowest | Mississippi · $29,370 |
|---|---|
| Highest | Alaska · $48,130 |
| Spread | $18,760 |
One dot per state that publishes this job. A missing state means suppressed data, not zero pay.
Best paid, and best off
The national median for this job
| Texas pays | $35,080 |
|---|---|
| Worth, after local prices | $36,100 |
Median pay against the same pay once BEA price parities are applied.
Every state, three ways
Sorted by what the money is actually worth. "Kept" is take-home for a single filer after federal, FICA and state income tax. "Really worth" divides that by the state's own price level, so a dollar in each row buys the same thing. Tap a state to put your own salary into it. States BLS does not publish for this job are absent — that means no published figure, not no work.
| State | Median pay | Kept after tax | Really worth |
|---|---|---|---|
| AK | $48,130 | $40,852 | $40,164 |
| VT | $44,720 | $36,871 | $38,155 |
| CO | $45,380 | $37,355 | $36,845 |
| NV | $39,600 | $33,999 | $35,057 |
| NH | $43,230 | $36,915 | $35,042 |
| WA | $44,460 | $37,904 | $34,914 |
| MA | $46,460 | $37,508 | $34,653 |
| CA | $47,040 | $38,959 | $34,606 |
| NJ | $45,190 | $37,541 | $34,478 |
| ND | $35,290 | $30,536 | $34,475 |
| HI | $46,170 | $37,187 | $34,239 |
| NY | $45,260 | $36,699 | $34,099 |
| TN | $36,220 | $31,283 | $33,814 |
| IA | $35,340 | $29,845 | $33,621 |
| ID | $36,830 | $30,674 | $33,551 |
| OH | $35,790 | $30,669 | $33,405 |
| SD | $33,910 | $29,427 | $33,403 |
| WY | $35,020 | $30,319 | $33,373 |
| NE | $35,930 | $30,118 | $33,326 |
| OR | $44,730 | $34,757 | $33,190 |
| NC | $37,190 | $31,087 | $33,022 |
| IN | $36,280 | $30,290 | $32,858 |
| DE | $39,630 | $32,390 | $32,634 |
| MD | $41,020 | $33,555 | $32,275 |
| KY | $34,940 | $29,149 | $32,220 |
| NM | $33,870 | $28,905 | $31,980 |
| MT | $34,100 | $28,733 | $31,840 |
| DC | $42,950 | $35,279 | $31,839 |
| WI | $35,010 | $29,438 | $31,621 |
| MO | $34,210 | $28,997 | $31,600 |
| MI | $35,890 | $29,743 | $31,580 |
| AL | $34,430 | $28,389 | $31,554 |
| MN | $37,190 | $30,891 | $31,388 |
| CT | $39,220 | $32,403 | $31,251 |
| TX | $35,080 | $30,367 | $31,250 |
| UT | $35,980 | $29,489 | $31,040 |
| AZ | $36,860 | $31,278 | $30,936 |
| ME | $35,930 | $29,876 | $30,770 |
| PA | $35,920 | $29,939 | $30,707 |
| FL | $36,770 | $31,725 | $30,666 |
| VA | $37,350 | $30,804 | $30,575 |
| GA | $35,440 | $29,486 | $30,493 |
| RI | $36,420 | $30,498 | $30,073 |
| IL | $35,880 | $29,378 | $29,719 |
| SC | $32,000 | $27,554 | $29,571 |
| AR | $29,910 | $25,565 | $29,552 |
| LA | $30,000 | $25,771 | $29,171 |
| KS | $31,190 | $25,789 | $28,666 |
| OK | $29,660 | $25,178 | $28,518 |
| WV | $29,860 | $25,450 | $28,349 |
| MS | $29,370 | $24,696 | $28,291 |
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle of the range, not a starting salary and not an offer. Half of floral designers earn less than the figures here and half earn more, and experience, employer and city move an individual a long way from the middle. Nationally the middle earns $37,360.
- Take-home figures for floral designers assume one person filing alone, with no dependants and nothing going into a pension before tax. Any of those lowers the tax and raises what you keep, so treat these as the plain case rather than your case. Local city income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those matter. In Alaska, the best state after tax, the figure works out at $40,852.
- The price adjustment for floral designers uses a statewide figure, and states are not uniform. A city and a rural county in the same state can differ more from each other than two states do, so treat the real-terms comparison as a direction rather than a precise answer — Mississippi anchors the bottom at $28,291. The wage data and the price data also come from different years, because that is how each is published.
- Figures are medians of the published wage distribution for floral designers, not entry-level or offer wages. The national median is $37,360, with half of workers below it; dispersion within a state routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, driven by tenure, employer size, sector and metropolitan area. An individual's position in the distribution is not predictable from geography alone.
- Take-home calculations for floral designers assume a single filer with no dependants, the standard deduction, and no pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figures function as a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape; the highest such figure is $40,852, in Alaska. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland and parts of a few other states.
- Real-terms figures for floral designers deflate take-home by a statewide regional price parity, which conceals substantial intra-state variation — metropolitan and non-metropolitan price levels within one state frequently differ by more than two states differ from each other. The wage and price series also carry different reference periods, as each is published on its own schedule, so the adjustment is directionally sound rather than precisely dated.