Food Processing Workers, All Other in New Hampshire
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$38,667
after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax
Tax takes
$6,743
14.8% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$36,705
New Hampshire costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in New Hampshire — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$45,410
Kept after tax
$38,667
Worth in national money
$36,705
State rank
4
of 46 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Pay for food processing workers, all other is strong here. New Hampshire's middle earner gets $45,410, putting the state 4 of 46 — about 14.44% ahead of the national figure.
- Against 488 occupations New Hampshire publishes, food processing workers, all other lands at 404. That is the lower quarter. That is the comparison people actually feel, more than any national table.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $45,410 the take-home is $38,667. But New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $36,705 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is lower, $44,470, so pay clusters nearer the top than usual.
- For food processing workers, all other, New Hampshire sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $45,410, ranking 4 of 46 and running about 14.44% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
- Within New Hampshire, this work ranks 404 of 488 occupations by median pay, in the bottom quartile. The within-state position is the more salient one for anyone weighing this job against alternatives available to them locally.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and New Hampshire income tax is $38,667 for food processing workers, all other, from $45,410. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $36,705. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $44,470 falls below the median, a left skew that is uncommon in wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Food Processing Workers, All Other
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $37,420 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $45,410 |
| Top tenth earn over | $49,670 |
| This salary | $45,410 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in New Hampshire | $38,667 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $38,667 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$3,086 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $45,410 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$3,732 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 105 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Half the people doing this work in New Hampshire earn less than $45,410. The published range is $37,420 up to $49,670, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
- That $38,667 take-home in New Hampshire comes from $45,410. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 404 of 488.
- One number stands for prices across all of New Hampshire, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $36,705, the adjusted value of that $45,410 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 404 of 488 in the state.
- Reported values are medians; for food processing workers, all other in New Hampshire the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $37,420 to $49,670. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
- Retained pay of $38,667, from $45,410, assumes a single New Hampshire filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 404 of 488 locally, and the state ranks 4 of 46 for it.
- Price deflation uses one statewide parity for New Hampshire, so $36,705 — the adjusted value of that $45,410 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 404 of 488 locally.
Questions people ask
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
Less than you might expect. The bottom tenth earn $37,420 and the top tenth $49,670, so most people doing this work in New Hampshire sit within a fairly tight band.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $36,705 rather than its face figure.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Less than people assume. $38,667 of this wage reaches your account, because New Hampshire takes no income tax from wages — but federal tax, Social Security and Medicare still apply exactly as they do everywhere else.
Why is this job missing from some states?
Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 46 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($37,420 to $49,670) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to New Hampshire rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $36,705 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $38,667 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 46 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.