Healthcare Support Workers, All Other in New Hampshire

A stethoscope and folded scrubs in a sunlit clinical workspace.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$38,707

after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax

Tax takes

$6,753

14.9% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$36,743

New Hampshire costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$45,460

Kept after tax

$38,707

Worth in national money

$36,743

State rank

34

of 51 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Neither high nor low. New Hampshire is 34 of 51 states for healthcare support workers, all other, with a middle wage of $45,460. What that is worth is the question the rest of this page answers.
  • Within New Hampshire this is lower-paid work. Of 488 occupations the state publishes figures for, healthcare support workers, all other ranks 403. That is the bottom quarter locally, whatever the national comparison says.
  • New Hampshire is an expensive state, and the adjusted figure shows it. From $45,460 the take-home is $38,707; in national-average money that behaves like $36,743. The average comes to $47,440, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
  • New Hampshire ranks 34 of 51 for healthcare support workers, all other at $45,460. The nominal figure is unremarkable; the adjusted figures are where the state's actual position for this occupation is determined.
  • Against every occupation New Hampshire reports, healthcare support workers, all other ranks 403 of 488, in the lowest quartile of the state's distribution. That position is set by the local labor market and is independent of how the state compares nationally for this work.
  • Take-home for healthcare support workers, all other in New Hampshire, on $45,460, is $38,707; deflated by the state's price level, $36,743. ⚠️ The deflator is statewide, so it understates the erosion in the state's metropolitan areas and overstates it outside them. At $47,440 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Healthcare Support Workers, All Other

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$35,060
Half earn under$45,460
Top tenth earn over$61,770
This salary$45,460

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in New Hampshire$38,707
Take-home in Texas$38,707
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$3,089

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $45,460$41,724
$41,724in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$45,460
You could take a cut of−$3,736
Prices in Texas97 vs 105

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of healthcare support workers, all other in New Hampshire earn under $45,460 and half over. The published range runs $35,060 at the tenth percentile to $61,770 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • In New Hampshire the take-home figure of $38,707, from $45,460, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 403 of 488 occupations here.
  • One number stands for prices across all of New Hampshire, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $36,743, the adjusted value of that $45,460 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 403 of 488 in the state.
  • Figures are distribution medians for healthcare support workers, all other in New Hampshire, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $35,060 to $61,770; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • Take-home for New Hampshire is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $38,707 from $45,460. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 403 of 488 locally.
  • Price deflation uses one statewide parity for New Hampshire, so $36,743 — the adjusted value of that $45,460 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 403 of 488 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $47,440 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.

How much does pay for this job actually vary?

Most of these jobs pay within a close range — $35,060 at the tenth percentile, $61,770 at the ninetieth.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

The number and the value are different things. New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $36,743 rather than its face figure.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

Most of it arrives. $38,707 lands after tax, since there is no state income tax on wages here — though the federal floor is identical in every state.

Can I compare this job across every state?

All 51 jurisdictions report this work, which makes the ranking a like-for-like one.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in New Hampshire is $47,440. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?

The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($35,060 to $61,770) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to New Hampshire rather than a national figure.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $36,743 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $38,707 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Is this occupation's state coverage complete?

State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.