Industrial Engineering Technologists and Technicians in New Hampshire
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$57,829
after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax
Tax takes
$11,821
17.0% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$54,895
New Hampshire costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in New Hampshire — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$69,650
Kept after tax
$57,829
Worth in national money
$54,895
State rank
14
of 45 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- New Hampshire is one of the better-paying states for this job. The middle earner takes $69,650, which ranks 14 of 45 states with published figures. That is about 5.34% above the national middle.
- Ordinary, locally speaking. This job ranks 192 among 488 occupations New Hampshire publishes pay for.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $69,650 the take-home is $57,829. But New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $54,895 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $71,460, because the best-paid pull it up.
- New Hampshire ranks 14 of 45 states publishing a median for industrial engineering technologists and technicians, at $69,650 — about 5.34% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
- Position 192 of 488 in New Hampshire places industrial engineering technologists and technicians in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and New Hampshire income tax is $57,829 for industrial engineering technologists and technicians, from $69,650. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $54,895. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $71,460 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Industrial Engineering Technologists and Technicians
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $51,170 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $69,650 |
| Top tenth earn over | $93,570 |
| This salary | $69,650 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in New Hampshire | $57,829 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $57,829 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$4,615 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $69,650 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$5,974 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 105 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Treat $69,650 as a midpoint for New Hampshire, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $51,170 and the ninetieth is $93,570 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
- In New Hampshire the take-home figure of $57,829, from $69,650, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 192 of 488 occupations here.
- Two cautions on $54,895, the adjusted value of that $69,650 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of New Hampshire. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 192 of 488 locally.
- The New Hampshire median of $69,650 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $51,170 to $93,570. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
- Take-home for New Hampshire is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $57,829 from $69,650. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 192 of 488 locally.
- This $54,895 adjusted figure, worked from $69,650, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 192 of 488 in the state. The occupation ranks 192 of 488 locally.
Questions people ask
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
The range here is narrow. From $51,170 at the bottom tenth to $93,570 at the top, pay for this work clusters rather than spreads.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $54,895 of national purchasing power.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Less than people assume. $57,829 of this wage reaches your account, because New Hampshire takes no income tax from wages — but federal tax, Social Security and Medicare still apply exactly as they do everywhere else.
Why is this job missing from some states?
A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 45 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($51,170 to $93,570) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to New Hampshire rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $54,895 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $57,829 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 45 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.