Industrial Production Managers in Montana

A person arriving at a home office with a bag beside a laptop and navy coffee cup.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$88,277

after federal, FICA and Montana tax

Tax takes

$32,413

26.9% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$97,821

Montana costs less than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$120,690

Kept after tax

$88,277

Worth in national money

$97,821

State rank

29

of 50 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Neither high nor low. Montana is 29 of 50 states for industrial production managers, with a middle wage of $120,690. What that is worth is the question the rest of this page answers.
  • Within Montana this is well-paid work. Of 475 occupations with published figures in the state, industrial production managers ranks 16 — in the top quarter of everything people do there.
  • Cheaper living works in this state's favor. From $120,690 you keep $88,277 after tax, and local prices stretch that to the equivalent of $97,821 at national prices. Averages run higher here, $129,160, since top earners drag the number up.
  • Montana ranks 29 of 50 for industrial production managers at $120,690. The nominal figure is unremarkable; the adjusted figures are where the state's actual position for this occupation is determined.
  • Ranked against every occupation Montana publishes a median for, industrial production managers sits 16 of 475 — the upper quartile of the state's wage distribution. National standing and within-state standing are separate questions, and a job can occupy very different positions on each.
  • Retained pay in Montana is $88,277 after the full tax stack, from $120,690. Because the state's price level runs below the national average, the price-adjusted equivalent is $97,821 — a real-terms figure describing purchasing power rather than compensation, and not a number that appears on any pay stub. Mean pay of $129,160 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Industrial Production Managers

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$79,990
Half earn under$120,690
Top tenth earn over$182,400
This salary$120,690

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$5,458take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Montana$88,277
Take-home in Texas$93,735
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity−$1,360

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0$122,591
$122,591in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$112,932
Raise you would need+$1,901
Prices in Texas97 vs 90

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of industrial production managers in Montana earn under $120,690 and half over. The published range runs $79,990 at the tenth percentile to $182,400 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Montana's $88,277, worked from $120,690. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 16 of 475.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $97,821 uses one figure for the whole of Montana. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 475 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 16.
  • Figures are distribution medians for industrial production managers in Montana, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $79,990 to $182,400; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • The Montana take-home of $88,277, on $120,690 for work ranking 16 of 475 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 16 of 475 in the state.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $97,821, worked from $120,690, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Montana address, on work sitting at 16 of 475 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $129,160 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $79,990 and the top tenth $182,400 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.

What does this pay actually buy where I live?

A smaller wage in a cheaper place is not automatically less. Adjusted for local prices, this is worth $97,821.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Into four separate taxes, not one. Federal income tax, Social Security and Medicare apply everywhere, and Montana adds its own income tax on top — which is why $88,277 of this wage survives to your account.

Why is this job missing from some states?

The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 50 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Montana is $129,160. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($79,990) and the ninetieth ($182,400) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?

Montana's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $97,821 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $88,277 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Montana income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.