Information Security Analysts in Vermont
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$80,906
after federal, FICA and Vermont tax
Tax takes
$28,844
26.3% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$83,723
Vermont costs less than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Vermont — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$109,750
Kept after tax
$80,906
Worth in national money
$83,723
State rank
29
of 48 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Vermont sits in the middle of the pack for this job. The median is $109,750, ranking 29 of 48 states with figures. Close enough to the national middle that where you live matters more than the headline suggests.
- Within Vermont this is well-paid work. Of 453 occupations with published figures in the state, this job ranks 34 — in the top quarter of everything people do there.
- Here is where Vermont does better than its wage suggests. From a median of $109,750 you keep $80,906, and because things cost less here than the national average, that behaves like $83,723 would elsewhere. The average is higher, $122,390, because the best-paid pull it up.
- Vermont occupies the middle band for information security analysts: a median of $109,750, ranking 29 of 48. Where nominal pay is close to the national figure, the tax and price adjustments below carry proportionally more weight in determining the real outcome.
- Ranked against every occupation Vermont publishes a median for, information security analysts sits 34 of 453 — the upper quartile of the state's wage distribution. National standing and within-state standing are separate questions, and a job can occupy very different positions on each.
- After federal, FICA and Vermont income tax, retained pay for information security analysts on $109,750 is $80,906. Deflating by the state's price level — below the national average — gives $83,723 in national-average terms. ⚠️ That figure is purchasing power, not a wage, and nobody is paid it; it is what the take-home buys. The mean of $122,390 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Information Security Analysts
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $74,840 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $109,750 |
| Top tenth earn over | $179,130 |
| This salary | $109,750 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Vermont | $80,906 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $86,039 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$4,817 |
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $102,453 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$6,654 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 97 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Treat $109,750 as a midpoint for Vermont, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $74,840 and the ninetieth is $179,130 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
- That $80,906 take-home in Vermont comes from $109,750. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 34 of 453.
- Two cautions on $83,723, the adjusted value of that $109,750 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Vermont. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 34 of 453 locally.
- The Vermont median of $109,750 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $74,840 to $179,130. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
- Retained pay of $80,906, from $109,750, assumes a single Vermont filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 34 of 453 locally, and the state ranks 29 of 48 for it.
- This $83,723 adjusted figure, worked from $109,750, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 34 of 453 in the state. The occupation ranks 34 of 453 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $122,390, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $74,840 and the top tenth $179,130 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.
What does this pay actually buy where I live?
A smaller wage in a cheaper place is not automatically less. Adjusted for local prices, this is worth $83,723.
Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?
Four deductions, stacked. The federal layer and the two payroll taxes apply wherever you work; Vermont then takes its own share, leaving $80,906.
Why is this job missing from some states?
The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 48 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Vermont is $122,390. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($74,840) and the ninetieth ($179,130) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?
Vermont's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $83,723 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.
What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?
Take-home of $80,906 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Vermont income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 48 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.