Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses in New Hampshire
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$63,077
after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax
Tax takes
$14,033
18.2% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$59,876
New Hampshire costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in New Hampshire — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$77,110
Kept after tax
$63,077
Worth in national money
$59,876
State rank
7
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Pay for this job is strong here. New Hampshire's middle earner gets $77,110, putting the state 7 of 51 — about 19.74% ahead of the national figure.
- Middle of the local pack. Of 488 occupations New Hampshire reports figures for, this is number 153.
- New Hampshire is an expensive state, and the adjusted figure shows it. From $77,110 the take-home is $63,077; in national-average money that behaves like $59,876. The average lands at $76,570, below the middle of the range.
- For licensed practical and licensed vocational nurses, New Hampshire sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $77,110, ranking 7 of 51 and running about 19.74% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
- In New Hampshire's occupational distribution, licensed practical and licensed vocational nurses sits at 153 of 488 — neither quartile. This local position is what a resident compares against, and it is determined by the state's own labor market rather than by national patterns for this occupation.
- Take-home for licensed practical and licensed vocational nurses in New Hampshire, on $77,110, is $63,077; deflated by the state's price level, $59,876. ⚠️ The deflator is statewide, so it understates the erosion in the state's metropolitan areas and overstates it outside them. At $76,570 the mean undershoots the median, an inversion of the usual skew.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $59,860 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $77,110 |
| Top tenth earn over | $93,660 |
| This salary | $77,110 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in New Hampshire | $63,077 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $63,077 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$5,034 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $77,110 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$6,954 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 105 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of licensed practical and licensed vocational nurses in New Hampshire earn under $77,110 and half over. The published range runs $59,860 at the tenth percentile to $93,660 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- That $63,077 take-home in New Hampshire comes from $77,110. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 153 of 488.
- Two cautions on $59,876, the adjusted value of that $77,110 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of New Hampshire. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 153 of 488 locally.
- Figures are distribution medians for licensed practical and licensed vocational nurses in New Hampshire, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $59,860 to $93,660; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Retained pay of $63,077, from $77,110, assumes a single New Hampshire filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 153 of 488 locally, and the state ranks 7 of 51 for it.
- This $59,876 adjusted figure, worked from $77,110, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 153 of 488 in the state. The occupation ranks 153 of 488 locally.
Questions people ask
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
Most of these jobs pay within a close range — $59,860 at the tenth percentile, $93,660 at the ninetieth.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $59,876 rather than its face figure.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $63,077 survives, because New Hampshire levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Can I compare this job across every state?
This occupation is published everywhere — all 51 of them — so comparing states measures real differences rather than gaps in the data.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($59,860 to $93,660) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to New Hampshire rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $59,876 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $63,077 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.