Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education in New Hampshire

Books, colored pencils and a globe in a bright classroom.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$63,042

after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax

Tax takes

$14,018

18.2% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$59,843

New Hampshire costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$77,060

Kept after tax

$63,042

Worth in national money

$59,843

State rank

16

of 51 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • This is a good state for the work. New Hampshire pays this job a middle wage of $77,060, ranking 16 of 51 states and sitting about 6.97% above the national middle.
  • Middle of the local pack. Of 488 occupations New Hampshire reports figures for, this is number 155.
  • Costs eat into it here. Of $77,060, tax leaves $63,042 — and because New Hampshire is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $59,843 would nationally. Here the average runs under the middle, at $72,040.
  • New Hampshire's median for secondary school teachers, except special and career/technical education is $77,060, about 6.97% above the national figure and 16 of 51 states reporting. Whether that premium reaches the worker depends on the two adjustments below, which is the part a wage table cannot tell you.
  • In New Hampshire's occupational distribution, secondary school teachers, except special and career/technical education sits at 155 of 488 — neither quartile. This local position is what a resident compares against, and it is determined by the state's own labor market rather than by national patterns for this occupation.
  • After tax, $63,042 remains from the New Hampshire median of $77,060 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $59,843 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $72,040 sits under the median, so the lower tail is the longer one.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$48,570
Half earn under$77,060
Top tenth earn over$96,510
This salary$77,060

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in New Hampshire$63,042
Take-home in Texas$63,042
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$5,031

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $77,060$70,110
$70,110in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$77,060
You could take a cut of−$6,950
Prices in Texas97 vs 105

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $77,060 as a midpoint for New Hampshire, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $48,570 and the ninetieth is $96,510 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • In New Hampshire the take-home figure of $63,042, from $77,060, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 155 of 488 occupations here.
  • Two cautions on $59,843, the adjusted value of that $77,060 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of New Hampshire. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 155 of 488 locally.
  • The New Hampshire median of $77,060 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $48,570 to $96,510. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • Take-home for New Hampshire is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $63,042 from $77,060. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 155 of 488 locally.
  • This $59,843 adjusted figure, worked from $77,060, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 155 of 488 in the state. The occupation ranks 155 of 488 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $72,040, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.

How much does pay for this job actually vary?

The range here is narrow. From $48,570 at the bottom tenth to $96,510 at the top, pay for this work clusters rather than spreads.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

Not on its own. Prices in New Hampshire run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $59,843 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

Less than people assume. $63,042 of this wage reaches your account, because New Hampshire takes no income tax from wages — but federal tax, Social Security and Medicare still apply exactly as they do everywhere else.

Can I compare this job across every state?

All 51 jurisdictions report this work, which makes the ranking a like-for-like one.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in New Hampshire is $72,040. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?

The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($48,570 to $96,510) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to New Hampshire rather than a national figure.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $59,843 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $63,042 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Is this occupation's state coverage complete?

State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.