Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists in Montana

A stethoscope and folded scrubs in a sunlit clinical workspace.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$66,448

after federal, FICA and Montana tax

Tax takes

$20,502

23.6% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$73,631

Montana costs less than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$86,950

Kept after tax

$66,448

Worth in national money

$73,631

State rank

33

of 51 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Middling, nationally. Montana pays this job around $86,950 at the midpoint, 33 of 51 states. The interesting numbers on this page are the two below it.
  • This is one of the better-paid jobs in Montana. It ranks 75 out of 475 occupations the state publishes figures for, which puts it in the top quarter locally.
  • Here is where Montana does better than its wage suggests. From a median of $86,950 you keep $66,448, and because things cost less here than the national average, that behaves like $73,631 would elsewhere. The average is lower, $86,900, so pay clusters nearer the top than usual.
  • For magnetic resonance imaging technologists the Montana median is $86,950, ranking 33 of 51 states reporting. Mid-band nominal positions are the ones most frequently reordered by the adjustments, because no large wage premium exists to absorb a state's tax or price level.
  • Within Montana, magnetic resonance imaging technologists ranks 75 of 475 occupations by median pay, placing it in the top quartile of the local distribution. This is the comparison a resident actually makes — against neighbors rather than against the same job elsewhere.
  • After federal, FICA and Montana income tax, retained pay for magnetic resonance imaging technologists on $86,950 is $66,448. Deflating by the state's price level — below the national average — gives $73,631 in national-average terms. ⚠️ That figure is purchasing power, not a wage, and nobody is paid it; it is what the take-home buys. The mean of $86,900 falls below the median, a left skew that is uncommon in wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$72,030
Half earn under$86,950
Top tenth earn over$101,020
This salary$86,950

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$3,552take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Montana$66,448
Take-home in Texas$69,999
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity−$1,597

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0$89,156
$89,156in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$81,901
Raise you would need+$2,206
Prices in Texas97 vs 90

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $86,950 as a midpoint for Montana, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $72,030 and the ninetieth is $101,020 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Montana's $66,448, worked from $86,950. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 75 of 475.
  • Two cautions on $73,631, the adjusted value of that $86,950 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Montana. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 75 of 475 locally.
  • The Montana median of $86,950 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $72,030 to $101,020. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • The Montana take-home of $66,448, on $86,950 for work ranking 75 of 475 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 75 of 475 in the state.
  • This $73,631 adjusted figure, worked from $86,950, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 75 of 475 in the state. The occupation ranks 75 of 475 locally.

Questions people ask

How much does pay for this job actually vary?

Less than you might expect. The bottom tenth earn $72,030 and the top tenth $101,020, so most people doing this work in Montana sit within a fairly tight band.

What does this pay actually buy where I live?

More than the figure suggests. Prices in Montana sit below the national level, so take-home here stretches like $73,631 would elsewhere. The wage is the same; the ground it covers is larger.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Four deductions, stacked. The federal layer and the two payroll taxes apply wherever you work; Montana then takes its own share, leaving $66,448.

Can I compare this job across every state?

All 51 jurisdictions report this work, which makes the ranking a like-for-like one.

What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?

The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($72,030 to $101,020) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Montana rather than a national figure.

What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?

Montana's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $73,631 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $66,448 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Montana income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Is this occupation's state coverage complete?

State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.