Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists in North Dakota

A stethoscope and folded scrubs in a sunlit clinical workspace.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$65,226

after federal, FICA and North Dakota tax

Tax takes

$15,384

19.1% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$73,642

North Dakota costs less than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$80,610

Kept after tax

$65,226

Worth in national money

$73,642

State rank

44

of 51 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • North Dakota is among the lower-paying states for this job. The middle earner takes $80,610, ranking 44 of 51 states — about 15.57% below the national middle. Costs here are often lower too, which the figures further down account for.
  • This is one of the better-paid jobs in North Dakota. It ranks 103 out of 460 occupations the state publishes figures for, which puts it in the top quarter locally.
  • Here is where North Dakota does better than its wage suggests. From a median of $80,610 you keep $65,226, and because things cost less here than the national average, that behaves like $73,642 would elsewhere. The average is higher, $81,490, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • North Dakota ranks 44 of 51 for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, with a median of $80,610 — about 15.57% below the national figure. A nominal shortfall is not by itself a real one: lower-paying states frequently carry lower tax and lower price levels, and the adjusted figures below are where that is settled rather than assumed.
  • Within North Dakota, magnetic resonance imaging technologists ranks 103 of 460 occupations by median pay, placing it in the top quartile of the local distribution. This is the comparison a resident actually makes — against neighbors rather than against the same job elsewhere.
  • After federal, FICA and North Dakota income tax, retained pay for magnetic resonance imaging technologists on $80,610 is $65,226. Deflating by the state's price level — below the national average — gives $73,642 in national-average terms. ⚠️ That figure is purchasing power, not a wage, and nobody is paid it; it is what the take-home buys. The mean of $81,490 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$69,180
Half earn under$80,610
Top tenth earn over$95,800
This salary$80,610

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$313take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in North Dakota$65,226
Take-home in Texas$65,539
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity−$6,198

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0$89,171
$89,171in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$80,166
Raise you would need+$8,561
Prices in Texas97 vs 89

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $80,610 as a midpoint for North Dakota, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $69,180 and the ninetieth is $95,800 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind North Dakota's $65,226, worked from $80,610. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 103 of 460.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $73,642 uses one figure for the whole of North Dakota. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 460 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 103.
  • The North Dakota median of $80,610 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $69,180 to $95,800. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • The North Dakota take-home of $65,226, on $80,610 for work ranking 103 of 460 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 103 of 460 in the state.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $73,642, worked from $80,610, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular North Dakota address, on work sitting at 103 of 460 locally.

Questions people ask

How much does pay for this job actually vary?

The range here is narrow. From $69,180 at the bottom tenth to $95,800 at the top, pay for this work clusters rather than spreads.

What does this pay actually buy where I live?

Further than the number implies. North Dakota is cheaper than the national average, so this take-home behaves like $73,642 in national terms.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Into four separate taxes, not one. Federal income tax, Social Security and Medicare apply everywhere, and North Dakota adds its own income tax on top — which is why $65,226 of this wage survives to your account.

Can I compare this job across every state?

This occupation is published everywhere — all 51 of them — so comparing states measures real differences rather than gaps in the data.

What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?

The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($69,180 to $95,800) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to North Dakota rather than a national figure.

What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?

North Dakota's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $73,642 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $65,226 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and North Dakota income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Is this occupation's state coverage complete?

State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.