Marketing Managers in Washington
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$129,013
after federal, FICA and Washington tax
Tax takes
$43,257
25.1% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$118,838
Washington costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Washington — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$172,270
Kept after tax
$129,013
Worth in national money
$118,838
State rank
9
of 48 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Washington is one of the better-paying states for marketing managers. The middle earner takes $172,270, which ranks 9 of 48 states with published figures. That is about 3.29% above the national middle.
- Locally, this pays well. Among 493 occupations Washington reports, marketing managers comes in at 11 — comfortably in the upper quarter.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $172,270 the take-home is $129,013. But Washington costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $118,838 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $185,590, because the best-paid pull it up.
- Washington ranks 9 of 48 states publishing a median for marketing managers, at $172,270 — about 3.29% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
- Marketing managers ranks 11 of 493 occupations by median in Washington, in the top quartile. Within-state position is largely independent of national position, so this holds regardless of how the state compares to others for the same work.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and Washington income tax is $129,013 for marketing managers, from $172,270. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $118,838. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $185,590 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Marketing Managers
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $98,220 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $172,270 |
| Top tenth earn over | $293,590 |
| This salary | $172,270 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Washington | $129,013 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $129,013 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$13,925 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $172,270 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$19,798 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 109 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of marketing managers in Washington earn under $172,270 and half over. The published range runs $98,220 at the tenth percentile to $293,590 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- That $129,013 take-home in Washington comes from $172,270. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 11 of 493.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $118,838 uses one figure for the whole of Washington. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 493 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 11.
- Figures are distribution medians for marketing managers in Washington, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $98,220 to $293,590; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Retained pay of $129,013, from $172,270, assumes a single Washington filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 11 of 493 locally, and the state ranks 9 of 48 for it.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $118,838, worked from $172,270, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Washington address, on work sitting at 11 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $185,590, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
The label is broader than the work. From $98,220 at the bottom tenth to $293,590 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $118,838 of national purchasing power.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $129,013 survives, because Washington levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Why is this job missing from some states?
The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 48 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $185,590. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($98,220) and the ninetieth ($293,590) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $118,838 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $129,013 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 48 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.