Medical Records Specialists in Washington
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$52,214
after federal, FICA and Washington tax
Tax takes
$10,056
16.1% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$48,096
Washington costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Washington — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$62,270
Kept after tax
$52,214
Worth in national money
$48,096
State rank
4
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Pay for medical records specialists is strong here. Washington's middle earner gets $62,270, putting the state 4 of 51 — about 21.76% ahead of the national figure.
- Ordinary, locally speaking. Medical records specialists ranks 292 among 493 occupations Washington publishes pay for.
- Costs eat into it here. Of $62,270, tax leaves $52,214 — and because Washington is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $48,096 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $67,480, since top earners drag the number up.
- For medical records specialists, Washington sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $62,270, ranking 4 of 51 and running about 21.76% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
- Position 292 of 493 in Washington places medical records specialists in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
- After tax, $52,214 remains from the Washington median of $62,270 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $48,096 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $67,480 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Medical Records Specialists
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $45,500 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $62,270 |
| Top tenth earn over | $98,130 |
| This salary | $62,270 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Washington | $52,214 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $52,214 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$5,636 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $62,270 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$6,816 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 109 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of medical records specialists in Washington earn under $62,270 and half over. The published range runs $45,500 at the tenth percentile to $98,130 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Washington's $52,214, worked from $62,270. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 292 of 493.
- One number stands for prices across all of Washington, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $48,096, the adjusted value of that $62,270 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 292 of 493 in the state.
- Figures are distribution medians for medical records specialists in Washington, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $45,500 to $98,130; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- The Washington take-home of $52,214, on $62,270 for work ranking 292 of 493 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 292 of 493 in the state.
- Price deflation uses one statewide parity for Washington, so $48,096 — the adjusted value of that $62,270 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 292 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $67,480, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
The label is broader than the work. From $45,500 at the bottom tenth to $98,130 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
Not on its own. Prices in Washington run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $48,096 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Less than people assume. $52,214 of this wage reaches your account, because Washington takes no income tax from wages — but federal tax, Social Security and Medicare still apply exactly as they do everywhere else.
Can I compare this job across every state?
Yes for this one. Pay is published in all 51 jurisdictions, so a state-to-state comparison here rests on the same survey everywhere rather than on a patchwork.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $67,480. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($45,500) and the ninetieth ($98,130) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $48,096 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $52,214 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.