News Analysts, Reporters, and Journalists in Alaska
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$37,389
after federal, FICA and Alaska tax
Tax takes
$6,431
14.7% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$36,759
Alaska costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Alaska — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$43,820
Kept after tax
$37,389
Worth in national money
$36,759
State rank
39
of 48 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- The nominal figure here is modest. Alaska pays this job a middle wage of $43,820, 39 of 48 states and about 29.55% below the national middle. Hold that thought until the adjusted numbers.
- Within Alaska this is lower-paid work. Of 430 occupations the state publishes figures for, this job ranks 376. That is the bottom quarter locally, whatever the national comparison says.
- No great distortion either way. Alaska costs about what the country costs, so from $43,820, take-home of $37,389 is worth roughly $36,759 in national money. The average comes to $55,900, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
- Alaska's $43,820 median for news analysts, reporters, and journalists places it 39 of 48 states, about 29.55% below national. Because both the tax and price adjustments tend to favor lower-nominal states, this ranking is the least stable of the three reported here.
- Against every occupation Alaska reports, news analysts, reporters, and journalists ranks 376 of 430, in the lowest quartile of the state's distribution. That position is set by the local labor market and is independent of how the state compares nationally for this work.
- Price parity in Alaska is near the national base, so for news analysts, reporters, and journalists, whose median is $43,820, the adjusted figure of $36,759 differs little from $37,389 retained after tax. The state's position for this occupation is therefore set by wage and tax rather than by living costs. At $55,900 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: News Analysts, Reporters, and Journalists
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $38,310 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $43,820 |
| Top tenth earn over | $78,680 |
| This salary | $43,820 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Alaska | $37,389 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $37,389 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$1,717 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $43,820 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$2,077 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 102 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of news analysts, reporters, and journalists in Alaska earn under $43,820 and half over. The published range runs $38,310 at the tenth percentile to $78,680 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Alaska's $37,389, worked from $43,820. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 376 of 430.
- One number stands for prices across all of Alaska, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $36,759, the adjusted value of that $43,820 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 376 of 430 in the state.
- Figures are distribution medians for news analysts, reporters, and journalists in Alaska, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $38,310 to $78,680; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- The Alaska take-home of $37,389, on $43,820 for work ranking 376 of 430 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 376 of 430 in the state.
- Price deflation uses one statewide parity for Alaska, so $36,759 — the adjusted value of that $43,820 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 376 of 430 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $55,900 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
The label is broader than the work. From $38,310 at the bottom tenth to $78,680 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
Not on its own. Prices in Alaska run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $36,759 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Most of it arrives. $37,389 lands after tax, since there is no state income tax on wages here — though the federal floor is identical in every state.
Why is this job missing from some states?
A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 48 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Alaska is $55,900. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($38,310) and the ninetieth ($78,680) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Alaska's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $36,759 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Alaska levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $37,389 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 48 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.