Production Workers, All Other in Alaska

Machined metal parts and a CNC machine in a clean manufacturing workshop.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$37,180

after federal, FICA and Alaska tax

Tax takes

$6,380

14.6% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$36,554

Alaska costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$43,560

Kept after tax

$37,180

Worth in national money

$36,554

State rank

20

of 51 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Neither high nor low. Alaska is 20 of 51 states for production workers, all other, with a middle wage of $43,560. What that is worth is the question the rest of this page answers.
  • Within Alaska this is lower-paid work. Of 430 occupations the state publishes figures for, production workers, all other ranks 377. That is the bottom quarter locally, whatever the national comparison says.
  • No great distortion either way. Alaska costs about what the country costs, so from $43,560, take-home of $37,180 is worth roughly $36,554 in national money. The average comes to $55,010, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
  • Alaska ranks 20 of 51 for production workers, all other at $43,560. The nominal figure is unremarkable; the adjusted figures are where the state's actual position for this occupation is determined.
  • Against every occupation Alaska reports, production workers, all other ranks 377 of 430, in the lowest quartile of the state's distribution. That position is set by the local labor market and is independent of how the state compares nationally for this work.
  • Price parity in Alaska is near the national base, so for production workers, all other, whose median is $43,560, the adjusted figure of $36,554 differs little from $37,180 retained after tax. The state's position for this occupation is therefore set by wage and tax rather than by living costs. At $55,010 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Production Workers, All Other

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$36,680
Half earn under$43,560
Top tenth earn over$92,290
This salary$43,560

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Alaska$37,180
Take-home in Texas$37,180
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$1,708

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $43,560$41,495
$41,495in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$43,560
You could take a cut of−$2,065
Prices in Texas97 vs 102

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of production workers, all other in Alaska earn under $43,560 and half over. The published range runs $36,680 at the tenth percentile to $92,290 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Alaska's $37,180, worked from $43,560. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 377 of 430.
  • One number stands for prices across all of Alaska, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $36,554, the adjusted value of that $43,560 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 377 of 430 in the state.
  • Figures are distribution medians for production workers, all other in Alaska, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $36,680 to $92,290; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • The Alaska take-home of $37,180, on $43,560 for work ranking 377 of 430 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 377 of 430 in the state.
  • Price deflation uses one statewide parity for Alaska, so $36,554 — the adjusted value of that $43,560 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 377 of 430 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $55,010, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $36,680 and the top tenth $92,290 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $36,554 of national purchasing power.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

No. $37,180 survives, because Alaska levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.

Can I compare this job across every state?

This occupation is published everywhere — all 51 of them — so comparing states measures real differences rather than gaps in the data.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Alaska is $55,010. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($36,680) and the ninetieth ($92,290) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Alaska's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $36,554 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

Alaska levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $37,180 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Is this occupation's state coverage complete?

State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.