Nuclear Medicine Technologists in District of Columbia
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$83,934
after federal, FICA and District of Columbia tax
Tax takes
$32,696
28.0% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$75,750
District of Columbia costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in District of Columbia — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$116,630
Kept after tax
$83,934
Worth in national money
$75,750
State rank
10
of 49 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- District of Columbia is one of the better-paying states for nuclear medicine technologists. The middle earner takes $116,630, which ranks 10 of 49 states with published figures. That is about 15.05% above the national middle.
- Within District of Columbia this is well-paid work. Of 390 occupations with published figures in the state, nuclear medicine technologists ranks 63 — in the top quarter of everything people do there.
- District of Columbia is an expensive state, and the adjusted figure shows it. From $116,630 the take-home is $83,934; in national-average money that behaves like $75,750. The average comes to $121,850, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
- District of Columbia ranks 10 of 49 states publishing a median for nuclear medicine technologists, at $116,630 — about 15.05% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
- Ranked against every occupation District of Columbia publishes a median for, nuclear medicine technologists sits 63 of 390 — the upper quartile of the state's wage distribution. National standing and within-state standing are separate questions, and a job can occupy very different positions on each.
- Take-home for nuclear medicine technologists in District of Columbia, on $116,630, is $83,934; deflated by the state's price level, $75,750. ⚠️ The deflator is statewide, so it understates the erosion in the state's metropolitan areas and overstates it outside them. At $121,850 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Nuclear Medicine Technologists
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $96,160 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $116,630 |
| Top tenth earn over | $150,860 |
| This salary | $116,630 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in District of Columbia | $83,934 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $90,879 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$17,771 |
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $106,758 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$24,547 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 111 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Half the people doing this work in District of Columbia earn less than $116,630. The published range is $96,160 up to $150,860, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
- That $83,934 take-home in District of Columbia comes from $116,630. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 63 of 390.
- Two cautions on $75,750, the adjusted value of that $116,630 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of District of Columbia. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 63 of 390 locally.
- Reported values are medians; for nuclear medicine technologists in District of Columbia the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $96,160 to $150,860. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
- Retained pay of $83,934, from $116,630, assumes a single District of Columbia filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 63 of 390 locally, and the state ranks 10 of 49 for it.
- This $75,750 adjusted figure, worked from $116,630, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 63 of 390 in the state. The occupation ranks 63 of 390 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $121,850 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
Most of these jobs pay within a close range — $96,160 at the tenth percentile, $150,860 at the ninetieth.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. District of Columbia costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $75,750 rather than its face figure.
Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?
Into four separate taxes, not one. Federal income tax, Social Security and Medicare apply everywhere, and District of Columbia adds its own income tax on top — which is why $83,934 of this wage survives to your account.
Why is this job missing from some states?
The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 49 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in District of Columbia is $121,850. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($96,160 to $150,860) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to District of Columbia rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
District of Columbia's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $75,750 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?
Take-home of $83,934 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and District of Columbia income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 49 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.