Print Binding and Finishing Workers in Washington

Machined metal parts and a CNC machine in a clean manufacturing workshop.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$38,579

after federal, FICA and Washington tax

Tax takes

$6,721

14.8% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$35,536

Washington costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$45,300

Kept after tax

$38,579

Worth in national money

$35,536

State rank

16

of 50 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Pay for print binding and finishing workers is strong here. Washington's middle earner gets $45,300, putting the state 16 of 50 — about 7.12% ahead of the national figure.
  • Within Washington this is lower-paid work. Of 493 occupations the state publishes figures for, print binding and finishing workers ranks 445. That is the bottom quarter locally, whatever the national comparison says.
  • Costs eat into it here. Of $45,300, tax leaves $38,579 — and because Washington is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $35,536 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $48,400, since top earners drag the number up.
  • For print binding and finishing workers, Washington sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $45,300, ranking 16 of 50 and running about 7.12% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
  • Against every occupation Washington reports, print binding and finishing workers ranks 445 of 493, in the lowest quartile of the state's distribution. That position is set by the local labor market and is independent of how the state compares nationally for this work.
  • After tax, $38,579 remains from the Washington median of $45,300 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $35,536 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $48,400 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Print Binding and Finishing Workers

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$36,300
Half earn under$45,300
Top tenth earn over$62,380
This salary$45,300

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Washington$38,579
Take-home in Texas$38,579
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$4,164

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $45,300$40,264
$40,264in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$45,300
You could take a cut of−$5,036
Prices in Texas97 vs 109

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $45,300 as a midpoint for Washington, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $36,300 and the ninetieth is $62,380 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • In Washington the take-home figure of $38,579, from $45,300, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 445 of 493 occupations here.
  • Two cautions on $35,536, the adjusted value of that $45,300 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Washington. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 445 of 493 locally.
  • The Washington median of $45,300 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $36,300 to $62,380. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • Take-home for Washington is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $38,579 from $45,300. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 445 of 493 locally.
  • This $35,536 adjusted figure, worked from $45,300, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 445 of 493 in the state. The occupation ranks 445 of 493 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $48,400, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.

How much does pay for this job actually vary?

The range here is narrow. From $36,300 at the bottom tenth to $62,380 at the top, pay for this work clusters rather than spreads.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $35,536 of national purchasing power.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

No. $38,579 survives, because Washington levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.

Why is this job missing from some states?

Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 50 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $48,400. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?

The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($36,300 to $62,380) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Washington rather than a national figure.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $35,536 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $38,579 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.