Radiation Therapists in Washington
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$97,305
after federal, FICA and Washington tax
Tax takes
$28,575
22.7% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$89,631
Washington costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Washington — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$125,880
Kept after tax
$97,305
Worth in national money
$89,631
State rank
5
of 46 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Pay for radiation therapists is strong here. Washington's middle earner gets $125,880, putting the state 5 of 46 — about 19.53% ahead of the national figure.
- Locally, this pays well. Among 493 occupations Washington reports, radiation therapists comes in at 59 — comfortably in the upper quarter.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $125,880 the take-home is $97,305. But Washington costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $89,631 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $148,520, because the best-paid pull it up.
- For radiation therapists, Washington sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $125,880, ranking 5 of 46 and running about 19.53% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
- Radiation therapists ranks 59 of 493 occupations by median in Washington, in the top quartile. Within-state position is largely independent of national position, so this holds regardless of how the state compares to others for the same work.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and Washington income tax is $97,305 for radiation therapists, from $125,880. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $89,631. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $148,520 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Radiation Therapists
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $98,160 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $125,880 |
| Top tenth earn over | $174,670 |
| This salary | $125,880 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Washington | $97,305 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $97,305 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$10,503 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $125,880 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$14,624 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 109 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of radiation therapists in Washington earn under $125,880 and half over. The published range runs $98,160 at the tenth percentile to $174,670 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Washington's $97,305, worked from $125,880. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 59 of 493.
- Two cautions on $89,631, the adjusted value of that $125,880 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Washington. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 59 of 493 locally.
- Figures are distribution medians for radiation therapists in Washington, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $98,160 to $174,670; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- The Washington take-home of $97,305, on $125,880 for work ranking 59 of 493 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 59 of 493 in the state.
- This $89,631 adjusted figure, worked from $125,880, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 59 of 493 in the state. The occupation ranks 59 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $148,520, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
Less than you might expect. The bottom tenth earn $98,160 and the top tenth $174,670, so most people doing this work in Washington sit within a fairly tight band.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $89,631 of national purchasing power.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $97,305 survives, because Washington levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Why is this job missing from some states?
A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 46 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $148,520. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($98,160 to $174,670) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Washington rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $89,631 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $97,305 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 46 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.