Sales Representatives, Wholesale and Manufacturing, Technical and Scientific Products in Washington

A bright independent shop with household goods on wooden shelves.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$98,337

after federal, FICA and Washington tax

Tax takes

$29,053

22.8% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$90,581

Washington costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$127,390

Kept after tax

$98,337

Worth in national money

$90,581

State rank

7

of 49 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Washington is one of the better-paying states for this job. The middle earner takes $127,390, which ranks 7 of 49 states with published figures. That is about 21.42% above the national middle.
  • Locally, this pays well. Among 493 occupations Washington reports, this job comes in at 56 — comfortably in the upper quarter.
  • Costs eat into it here. Of $127,390, tax leaves $98,337 — and because Washington is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $90,581 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $133,370, since top earners drag the number up.
  • Washington ranks 7 of 49 states publishing a median for sales representatives, wholesale and manufacturing, technical and scientific products, at $127,390 — about 21.42% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
  • Sales representatives, wholesale and manufacturing, technical and scientific products ranks 56 of 493 occupations by median in Washington, in the top quartile. Within-state position is largely independent of national position, so this holds regardless of how the state compares to others for the same work.
  • After tax, $98,337 remains from the Washington median of $127,390 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $90,581 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $133,370 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Sales Representatives, Wholesale and Manufacturing, Technical and Scientific Products

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$60,900
Half earn under$127,390
Top tenth earn over$214,360
This salary$127,390

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Washington$98,337
Take-home in Texas$98,337
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$10,614

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $127,390$112,569
$112,569in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$127,390
You could take a cut of−$14,821
Prices in Texas97 vs 109

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $127,390 as a midpoint for Washington, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $60,900 and the ninetieth is $214,360 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • That $98,337 take-home in Washington comes from $127,390. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 56 of 493.
  • Two cautions on $90,581, the adjusted value of that $127,390 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Washington. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 56 of 493 locally.
  • The Washington median of $127,390 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $60,900 to $214,360. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • Retained pay of $98,337, from $127,390, assumes a single Washington filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 56 of 493 locally, and the state ranks 7 of 49 for it.
  • This $90,581 adjusted figure, worked from $127,390, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 56 of 493 in the state. The occupation ranks 56 of 493 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $133,370, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

The label is broader than the work. From $60,900 at the bottom tenth to $214,360 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

The number and the value are different things. Washington costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $90,581 rather than its face figure.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

Most of it arrives. $98,337 lands after tax, since there is no state income tax on wages here — though the federal floor is identical in every state.

Why is this job missing from some states?

Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 49 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $133,370. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($60,900) and the ninetieth ($214,360) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $90,581 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $98,337 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 49 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.