Social Scientists and Related Workers, All Other in Rhode Island

A sunlit research desk with a laptop, reference books, an abacus and a magnifying glass.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$69,163

after federal, FICA and Rhode Island tax

Tax takes

$20,797

23.1% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$68,200

Rhode Island costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$89,960

Kept after tax

$69,163

Worth in national money

$68,200

State rank

28

of 49 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Rhode Island sits in the middle of the pack for this job. The median is $89,960, ranking 28 of 49 states with figures. Close enough to the national middle that where you live matters more than the headline suggests.
  • Ordinary, locally speaking. This job ranks 114 among 452 occupations Rhode Island publishes pay for.
  • Prices here sit close to the national average, so the adjustment changes little. From $89,960 the take-home is $69,163, which is worth about $68,200 in comparable money. Tax does most of the work here, not cost of living. The average is higher, $93,920, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • Rhode Island occupies the middle band for social scientists and related workers, all other: a median of $89,960, ranking 28 of 49. Where nominal pay is close to the national figure, the tax and price adjustments below carry proportionally more weight in determining the real outcome.
  • Position 114 of 452 in Rhode Island places social scientists and related workers, all other in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
  • Rhode Island's price level is near the national average, so price deflation is close to neutral for social scientists and related workers, all other on its $89,960 median: $69,163 retained after tax becomes $68,200 in national-average terms. Where the price adjustment is small, the tax stack is the dominant determinant of the real outcome. The mean of $93,920 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Social Scientists and Related Workers, All Other

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$41,200
Half earn under$89,960
Top tenth earn over$161,460
This salary$89,960

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$2,954take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Rhode Island$69,163
Take-home in Texas$72,117
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$6,013

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $89,960$81,654
$81,654in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$85,762
You could take a cut of−$8,306
Prices in Texas97 vs 101

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of social scientists and related workers, all other in Rhode Island earn under $89,960 and half over. The published range runs $41,200 at the tenth percentile to $161,460 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Rhode Island's $69,163, worked from $89,960. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 114 of 452.
  • Two cautions on $68,200, the adjusted value of that $89,960 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Rhode Island. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 114 of 452 locally.
  • Figures are distribution medians for social scientists and related workers, all other in Rhode Island, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $41,200 to $161,460; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • The Rhode Island take-home of $69,163, on $89,960 for work ranking 114 of 452 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 114 of 452 in the state.
  • This $68,200 adjusted figure, worked from $89,960, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 114 of 452 in the state. The occupation ranks 114 of 452 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $93,920, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $41,200 and the top tenth $161,460 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $68,200 of national purchasing power.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Into four separate taxes, not one. Federal income tax, Social Security and Medicare apply everywhere, and Rhode Island adds its own income tax on top — which is why $69,163 of this wage survives to your account.

Why is this job missing from some states?

A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 49 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Rhode Island is $93,920. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($41,200) and the ninetieth ($161,460) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Rhode Island's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $68,200 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $69,163 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Rhode Island income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 49 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.