Social Workers, All Other in Vermont

Two armchairs facing each other in a welcoming counseling room.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$57,523

after federal, FICA and Vermont tax

Tax takes

$15,547

21.3% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$59,526

Vermont costs less than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$73,070

Kept after tax

$57,523

Worth in national money

$59,526

State rank

30

of 50 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Middling, nationally. Vermont pays social workers, all other around $73,070 at the midpoint, 30 of 50 states. The interesting numbers on this page are the two below it.
  • Against other work in Vermont, this sits in the middle: 155 of 453 occupations with published pay. Solidly ordinary for the state, which is not the same as ordinary nationally.
  • Here is where Vermont does better than its wage suggests. From a median of $73,070 you keep $57,523, and because things cost less here than the national average, that behaves like $59,526 would elsewhere. The average is higher, $77,860, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • For social workers, all other the Vermont median is $73,070, ranking 30 of 50 states reporting. Mid-band nominal positions are the ones most frequently reordered by the adjustments, because no large wage premium exists to absorb a state's tax or price level.
  • Social workers, all other ranks 155 of 453 occupations in Vermont by median pay, in the middle bands. Within-state and national positions are separate measurements and a job commonly sits in different quartiles on each.
  • After federal, FICA and Vermont income tax, retained pay for social workers, all other on $73,070 is $57,523. Deflating by the state's price level — below the national average — gives $59,526 in national-average terms. ⚠️ That figure is purchasing power, not a wage, and nobody is paid it; it is what the take-home buys. The mean of $77,860 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Social Workers, All Other

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$46,170
Half earn under$73,070
Top tenth earn over$113,760
This salary$73,070

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$2,712take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Vermont$57,523
Take-home in Texas$60,235
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$2,460

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $73,070$69,672
$69,672in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$69,215
You could take a cut of−$3,398
Prices in Texas97 vs 97

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $73,070 as a midpoint for Vermont, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $46,170 and the ninetieth is $113,760 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • In Vermont the take-home figure of $57,523, from $73,070, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 155 of 453 occupations here.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $59,526 uses one figure for the whole of Vermont. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 453 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 155.
  • The Vermont median of $73,070 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $46,170 to $113,760. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • Take-home for Vermont is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $57,523 from $73,070. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 155 of 453 locally.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $59,526, worked from $73,070, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Vermont address, on work sitting at 155 of 453 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $77,860, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $46,170 and the top tenth $113,760 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.

What does this pay actually buy where I live?

More than the figure suggests. Prices in Vermont sit below the national level, so take-home here stretches like $59,526 would elsewhere. The wage is the same; the ground it covers is larger.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Into four separate taxes, not one. Federal income tax, Social Security and Medicare apply everywhere, and Vermont adds its own income tax on top — which is why $57,523 of this wage survives to your account.

Why is this job missing from some states?

The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 50 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Vermont is $77,860. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($46,170) and the ninetieth ($113,760) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?

Vermont's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $59,526 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $57,523 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Vermont income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.