Statisticians in Massachusetts

A computer workspace with headphones, a laptop and a small circuit board.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$72,350

after federal, FICA and Massachusetts tax

Tax takes

$24,360

25.2% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$66,843

Massachusetts costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$96,710

Kept after tax

$72,350

Worth in national money

$66,843

State rank

25

of 45 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Middling, nationally. Massachusetts pays statisticians around $96,710 at the midpoint, 25 of 45 states. The interesting numbers on this page are the two below it.
  • Against other work in Massachusetts, this sits in the middle: 129 of 485 occupations with published pay. Solidly ordinary for the state, which is not the same as ordinary nationally.
  • The wage here flatters the reality. From $96,710 the take-home is $72,350. But Massachusetts costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $66,843 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $114,210, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • For statisticians the Massachusetts median is $96,710, ranking 25 of 45 states reporting. Mid-band nominal positions are the ones most frequently reordered by the adjustments, because no large wage premium exists to absorb a state's tax or price level.
  • Statisticians ranks 129 of 485 occupations in Massachusetts by median pay, in the middle bands. Within-state and national positions are separate measurements and a job commonly sits in different quartiles on each.
  • Retained pay after federal, FICA and Massachusetts income tax is $72,350 for statisticians, from $96,710. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $66,843. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $114,210 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Statisticians

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$76,920
Half earn under$96,710
Top tenth earn over$174,740
This salary$96,710

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$4,516take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Massachusetts$72,350
Take-home in Texas$76,865
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$12,257

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $96,710$79,780
$79,780in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$90,291
You could take a cut of−$16,930
Prices in Texas97 vs 108

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $96,710 as a midpoint for Massachusetts, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $76,920 and the ninetieth is $174,740 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • In Massachusetts the take-home figure of $72,350, from $96,710, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 129 of 485 occupations here.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $66,843 uses one figure for the whole of Massachusetts. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 485 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 129.
  • The Massachusetts median of $96,710 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $76,920 to $174,740. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • Take-home for Massachusetts is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $72,350 from $96,710. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 129 of 485 locally.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $66,843, worked from $96,710, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Massachusetts address, on work sitting at 129 of 485 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $114,210 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

One title, many jobs. The lowest tenth take $76,920, the highest tenth $174,740, and what separates them is experience, employer and what exactly the role does.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $66,843 of national purchasing power.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Into four separate taxes, not one. Federal income tax, Social Security and Medicare apply everywhere, and Massachusetts adds its own income tax on top — which is why $72,350 of this wage survives to your account.

Why is this job missing from some states?

Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 45 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Massachusetts is $114,210. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($76,920) and the ninetieth ($174,740) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Massachusetts's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $66,843 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $72,350 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Massachusetts income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 45 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.