Credit Analysts in Massachusetts

A person arriving at a home office with a bag beside a laptop and navy coffee cup.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$72,592

after federal, FICA and Massachusetts tax

Tax takes

$24,488

25.2% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$67,067

Massachusetts costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$97,080

Kept after tax

$72,592

Worth in national money

$67,067

State rank

8

of 51 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Massachusetts is one of the better-paying states for credit analysts. The middle earner takes $97,080, which ranks 8 of 51 states with published figures. That is about 16.25% above the national middle.
  • Ordinary, locally speaking. Credit analysts ranks 126 among 485 occupations Massachusetts publishes pay for.
  • Costs eat into it here. Of $97,080, tax leaves $72,592 — and because Massachusetts is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $67,067 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $105,580, since top earners drag the number up.
  • Massachusetts ranks 8 of 51 states publishing a median for credit analysts, at $97,080 — about 16.25% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
  • Position 126 of 485 in Massachusetts places credit analysts in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
  • After tax, $72,592 remains from the Massachusetts median of $97,080 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $67,067 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $105,580 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Credit Analysts

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$64,530
Half earn under$97,080
Top tenth earn over$173,680
This salary$97,080

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$4,534take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Massachusetts$72,592
Take-home in Texas$77,126
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$12,301

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $97,080$80,088
$80,088in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$90,635
You could take a cut of−$16,992
Prices in Texas97 vs 108

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of credit analysts in Massachusetts earn under $97,080 and half over. The published range runs $64,530 at the tenth percentile to $173,680 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • In Massachusetts the take-home figure of $72,592, from $97,080, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 126 of 485 occupations here.
  • Two cautions on $67,067, the adjusted value of that $97,080 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Massachusetts. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 126 of 485 locally.
  • Figures are distribution medians for credit analysts in Massachusetts, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $64,530 to $173,680; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • Take-home for Massachusetts is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $72,592 from $97,080. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 126 of 485 locally.
  • This $67,067 adjusted figure, worked from $97,080, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 126 of 485 in the state. The occupation ranks 126 of 485 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $105,580 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $64,530 and the top tenth $173,680 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

The number and the value are different things. Massachusetts costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $67,067 rather than its face figure.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Four deductions, stacked. The federal layer and the two payroll taxes apply wherever you work; Massachusetts then takes its own share, leaving $72,592.

Can I compare this job across every state?

All 51 jurisdictions report this work, which makes the ranking a like-for-like one.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Massachusetts is $105,580. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($64,530) and the ninetieth ($173,680) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Massachusetts's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $67,067 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $72,592 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Massachusetts income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Is this occupation's state coverage complete?

State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.