Tax Examiners and Collectors, and Revenue Agents in Nevada

A person arriving at a home office with a bag beside a laptop and navy coffee cup.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$61,944

after federal, FICA and Nevada tax

Tax takes

$13,556

18.0% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$63,873

Nevada costs less than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$75,500

Kept after tax

$61,944

Worth in national money

$63,873

State rank

10

of 50 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Pay for this job is strong here. Nevada's middle earner gets $75,500, putting the state 10 of 50 — about 21.05% ahead of the national figure.
  • Against other work in Nevada, this sits in the middle: 151 of 485 occupations with published pay. Solidly ordinary for the state, which is not the same as ordinary nationally.
  • Here is where Nevada does better than its wage suggests. From a median of $75,500 you keep $61,944, and because things cost less here than the national average, that behaves like $63,873 would elsewhere. The average is higher, $79,410, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • For tax examiners and collectors, and revenue agents, Nevada sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $75,500, ranking 10 of 50 and running about 21.05% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
  • Tax examiners and collectors, and revenue agents ranks 151 of 485 occupations in Nevada by median pay, in the middle bands. Within-state and national positions are separate measurements and a job commonly sits in different quartiles on each.
  • After federal, FICA and Nevada income tax, retained pay for tax examiners and collectors, and revenue agents on $75,500 is $61,944. Deflating by the state's price level — below the national average — gives $63,873 in national-average terms. ⚠️ That figure is purchasing power, not a wage, and nobody is paid it; it is what the take-home buys. The mean of $79,410 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Tax Examiners and Collectors, and Revenue Agents

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$52,000
Half earn under$75,500
Top tenth earn over$117,670
This salary$75,500

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Nevada$61,944
Take-home in Texas$61,944
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity−$128

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0$75,677
$75,677in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$75,500
Raise you would need+$177
Prices in Texas97 vs 97

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of tax examiners and collectors, and revenue agents in Nevada earn under $75,500 and half over. The published range runs $52,000 at the tenth percentile to $117,670 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Nevada's $61,944, worked from $75,500. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 151 of 485.
  • Two cautions on $63,873, the adjusted value of that $75,500 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Nevada. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 151 of 485 locally.
  • Figures are distribution medians for tax examiners and collectors, and revenue agents in Nevada, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $52,000 to $117,670; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • The Nevada take-home of $61,944, on $75,500 for work ranking 151 of 485 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 151 of 485 in the state.
  • This $63,873 adjusted figure, worked from $75,500, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 151 of 485 in the state. The occupation ranks 151 of 485 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $79,410, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $52,000 and the top tenth $117,670 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.

What does this pay actually buy where I live?

More than the figure suggests. Prices in Nevada sit below the national level, so take-home here stretches like $63,873 would elsewhere. The wage is the same; the ground it covers is larger.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

Most of it arrives. $61,944 lands after tax, since there is no state income tax on wages here — though the federal floor is identical in every state.

Why is this job missing from some states?

A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 50 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Nevada is $79,410. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($52,000) and the ninetieth ($117,670) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?

Nevada's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $63,873 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

Nevada levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $61,944 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.