Tax Examiners and Collectors, and Revenue Agents in Minnesota

A person arriving at a home office with a bag beside a laptop and navy coffee cup.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$60,558

after federal, FICA and Minnesota tax

Tax takes

$18,442

23.3% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$61,532

Minnesota costs less than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$79,000

Kept after tax

$60,558

Worth in national money

$61,532

State rank

7

of 50 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • This is a good state for the work. Minnesota pays this job a middle wage of $79,000, ranking 7 of 50 states and sitting about 26.66% above the national middle.
  • Middle of the local pack. Of 490 occupations Minnesota reports figures for, this is number 160.
  • Prices here sit close to the national average, so the adjustment changes little. From $79,000 the take-home is $60,558, which is worth about $61,532 in comparable money. Tax does most of the work here, not cost of living. The average is higher, $82,210, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • Minnesota's median for tax examiners and collectors, and revenue agents is $79,000, about 26.66% above the national figure and 7 of 50 states reporting. Whether that premium reaches the worker depends on the two adjustments below, which is the part a wage table cannot tell you.
  • In Minnesota's occupational distribution, tax examiners and collectors, and revenue agents sits at 160 of 490 — neither quartile. This local position is what a resident compares against, and it is determined by the state's own labor market rather than by national patterns for this occupation.
  • Minnesota's price level is near the national average, so price deflation is close to neutral for tax examiners and collectors, and revenue agents on its $79,000 median: $60,558 retained after tax becomes $61,532 in national-average terms. Where the price adjustment is small, the tax stack is the dominant determinant of the real outcome. The mean of $82,210 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Tax Examiners and Collectors, and Revenue Agents

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$54,160
Half earn under$79,000
Top tenth earn over$116,690
This salary$79,000

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$3,849take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Minnesota$60,558
Take-home in Texas$64,407
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$4,747

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $79,000$72,443
$72,443in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$73,529
You could take a cut of−$6,557
Prices in Texas97 vs 98

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of tax examiners and collectors, and revenue agents in Minnesota earn under $79,000 and half over. The published range runs $54,160 at the tenth percentile to $116,690 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Minnesota's $60,558, worked from $79,000. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 160 of 490.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $61,532 uses one figure for the whole of Minnesota. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 490 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 160.
  • Figures are distribution medians for tax examiners and collectors, and revenue agents in Minnesota, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $54,160 to $116,690; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • The Minnesota take-home of $60,558, on $79,000 for work ranking 160 of 490 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 160 of 490 in the state.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $61,532, worked from $79,000, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Minnesota address, on work sitting at 160 of 490 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $82,210, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

The label is broader than the work. From $54,160 at the bottom tenth to $116,690 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.

What does this pay actually buy where I live?

More than the figure suggests. Prices in Minnesota sit below the national level, so take-home here stretches like $61,532 would elsewhere. The wage is the same; the ground it covers is larger.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Three of them are federal and one is not. After income tax, Social Security, Medicare and Minnesota's own levy, $60,558 remains.

Why is this job missing from some states?

A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 50 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Minnesota is $82,210. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($54,160) and the ninetieth ($116,690) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?

Minnesota's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $61,532 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $60,558 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Minnesota income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.