Training and Development Managers in Alaska
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$83,000
after federal, FICA and Alaska tax
Tax takes
$22,430
21.3% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$81,601
Alaska costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Alaska — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$105,430
Kept after tax
$83,000
Worth in national money
$81,601
State rank
42
of 48 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Alaska is among the lower-paying states for this job. The middle earner takes $105,430, ranking 42 of 48 states — about 20.73% below the national middle. Costs here are often lower too, which the figures further down account for.
- Locally, this pays well. Among 430 occupations Alaska reports, this job comes in at 60 — comfortably in the upper quarter.
- Prices here sit close to the national average, so the adjustment changes little. From $105,430 the take-home is $83,000, which is worth about $81,601 in comparable money. Tax does most of the work here, not cost of living. The average is higher, $115,100, because the best-paid pull it up.
- Alaska ranks 42 of 48 for training and development managers, with a median of $105,430 — about 20.73% below the national figure. A nominal shortfall is not by itself a real one: lower-paying states frequently carry lower tax and lower price levels, and the adjusted figures below are where that is settled rather than assumed.
- Training and development managers ranks 60 of 430 occupations by median in Alaska, in the top quartile. Within-state position is largely independent of national position, so this holds regardless of how the state compares to others for the same work.
- Alaska's price level is near the national average, so price deflation is close to neutral for training and development managers on its $105,430 median: $83,000 retained after tax becomes $81,601 in national-average terms. Where the price adjustment is small, the tax stack is the dominant determinant of the real outcome. The mean of $115,100 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Training and Development Managers
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $72,440 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $105,430 |
| Top tenth earn over | $165,240 |
| This salary | $105,430 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Alaska | $83,000 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $83,000 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$3,812 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $105,430 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$5,266 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 102 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Half the people doing this work in Alaska earn less than $105,430. The published range is $72,440 up to $165,240, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
- One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Alaska's $83,000, worked from $105,430. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 60 of 430.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $81,601 uses one figure for the whole of Alaska. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 430 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 60.
- Reported values are medians; for training and development managers in Alaska the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $72,440 to $165,240. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
- The Alaska take-home of $83,000, on $105,430 for work ranking 60 of 430 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 60 of 430 in the state.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $81,601, worked from $105,430, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Alaska address, on work sitting at 60 of 430 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $115,100, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
The label is broader than the work. From $72,440 at the bottom tenth to $165,240 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $81,601 of national purchasing power.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $83,000 survives, because Alaska levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Why is this job missing from some states?
The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 48 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Alaska is $115,100. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($72,440) and the ninetieth ($165,240) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Alaska's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $81,601 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Alaska levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $83,000 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 48 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.