Training and Development Managers in New Hampshire
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$107,886
after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax
Tax takes
$33,474
23.7% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$102,412
New Hampshire costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in New Hampshire — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$141,360
Kept after tax
$107,886
Worth in national money
$102,412
State rank
8
of 48 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- This is a good state for the work. New Hampshire pays this job a middle wage of $141,360, ranking 8 of 48 states and sitting about 6.29% above the national middle.
- This is one of the better-paid jobs in New Hampshire. It ranks 19 out of 488 occupations the state publishes figures for, which puts it in the top quarter locally.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $141,360 the take-home is $107,886. But New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $102,412 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is lower, $141,170, so pay clusters nearer the top than usual.
- New Hampshire's median for training and development managers is $141,360, about 6.29% above the national figure and 8 of 48 states reporting. Whether that premium reaches the worker depends on the two adjustments below, which is the part a wage table cannot tell you.
- Within New Hampshire, training and development managers ranks 19 of 488 occupations by median pay, placing it in the top quartile of the local distribution. This is the comparison a resident actually makes — against neighbors rather than against the same job elsewhere.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and New Hampshire income tax is $107,886 for training and development managers, from $141,360. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $102,412. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $141,170 falls below the median, a left skew that is uncommon in wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Training and Development Managers
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $82,850 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $141,360 |
| Top tenth earn over | $203,830 |
| This salary | $141,360 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in New Hampshire | $107,886 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $107,886 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$8,610 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $141,360 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$12,241 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 105 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Treat $141,360 as a midpoint for New Hampshire, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $82,850 and the ninetieth is $203,830 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
- That $107,886 take-home in New Hampshire comes from $141,360. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 19 of 488.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $102,412 uses one figure for the whole of New Hampshire. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 488 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 19.
- The New Hampshire median of $141,360 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $82,850 to $203,830. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
- Retained pay of $107,886, from $141,360, assumes a single New Hampshire filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 19 of 488 locally, and the state ranks 8 of 48 for it.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $102,412, worked from $141,360, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular New Hampshire address, on work sitting at 19 of 488 locally.
Questions people ask
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
One title, many jobs. The lowest tenth take $82,850, the highest tenth $203,830, and what separates them is experience, employer and what exactly the role does.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $102,412 of national purchasing power.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $107,886 survives, because New Hampshire levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Why is this job missing from some states?
The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 48 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($82,850) and the ninetieth ($203,830) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $102,412 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $107,886 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 48 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.