Cleveland to Broadview Heights

Everyday commuter cars and a bus crossing a steel river bridge beside an American city.

Ohio municipal income tax, Chapter 718 framework · credit set by Cleveland ordinance · tax year 2026

Work city takes

2%

Broadview Heights, on income earned there

Home city charges

2.5%

Cleveland, residents

Credit back

$1,200

a share of the work tax

Cost of the commute

$0

a year, above working at home

What it costs you

no extra local tax
$
Local tax total
$1,500
to both cities, for the year
Because of the commute
$0
above working in Cleveland
Credit returned
$1,200
a share of the work tax

Cleveland credits only part of what Broadview Heights takes, so the remainder is taxed twice. Solid is what you pay; the faded part of the Cleveland bar is the credit it hands back. Municipal income tax only — state, federal and payroll tax apply on top, and an Ohio school district income tax may too.

What this commute actually costs

  • Here is the good news. Working in Broadview Heights costs you nothing extra in local tax. Cleveland charges residents about 2.5%, and it credits back every dollar Broadview Heights collects from you. Either way your bill is $1,500 a year. What changes is which city keeps the money, not how much of it you hand over.
  • Worth watching rather than worrying about. The credit from Cleveland runs out once Broadview Heights takes more than the ceiling allows, and today there is $300 a year of slack. A rate rise in Broadview Heights would eat into that first, and into your pay after.
  • Broadview Heights shows just one commuting route in this data, and it starts in Cleveland. Roughly 592 people make the trip. That is not the whole picture of who works there, only the part large enough to be published.
  • This pairing is neutral to the worker. Broadview Heights withholds about 2% on income earned there, and Cleveland, which levies about 2.5% on residents, credits that payment in full without reaching its own ceiling. Liability at the reference salary is therefore $1,500 — precisely what the same earnings would attract with no commute at all. What the arrangement alters is the division of revenue between Broadview Heights and Cleveland, not the sum leaving the worker's pay.
  • The margin is worth knowing, because it is not large. Cleveland credits tax paid to Broadview Heights only up to a ceiling set as a share of income, and Broadview Heights's levy currently sits below it with $300 of annual room to spare at the reference salary. Were Broadview Heights to raise its rate past that point, the excess would cease to be credited and would fall on the worker rather than on either treasury.
  • Within this dataset Broadview Heights draws a single recorded commuting flow of qualifying size — the one from Cleveland, carrying roughly 592 workers. That reflects the reporting floor rather than the labor market: smaller flows certainly exist and fall below the threshold at which Census origin-destination statistics are published. No ranking against sibling routes is therefore available for this workplace.

Where the money goes

A $75,000 salary

  • Federal income tax$7,670
  • Social Security and Medicare$5,738
  • State income tax$1,346
  • Yours$60,246
Federal income tax10.23%$7,670
Social Security and Medicare7.65%$5,738
State income tax1.79%$1,346
Yours80.33%$60,246

The arithmetic, step by step

Cleveland to Broadview Heights municipal tax breakdown
Broadview Heights takes, on income earned there$1,200
Cleveland charges residents$1,500
Less the credit Cleveland gives back$1,200
Total local tax$1,500
If you also lived in Broadview Heights$1,500
Difference$0

On a reference salary of $60,000 a year. Both rates and the credit ceiling are shares of income, so every figure scales with your own pay.

What this page does not cover

  • Do not add the two rates up, and do not assume the bigger one simply wins. Neither is how Ohio works. Both Broadview Heights and Cleveland charge you. Cleveland may then hand back what Broadview Heights took, or part of it, or none of it. Everything on this page turns on which of those it does.
  • These figures rest on a local rule, not a state one. Cleveland decides how much credit to give for tax already paid to Broadview Heights. It is worth confirming the current position with the city or its collection agency, because this is the part most likely to have changed.
  • Watch for one more local tax. School district income tax is separate from what Cleveland and Broadview Heights charge, and plenty of Ohio districts levy it. Working elsewhere makes no difference to it, and no credit offsets it.
  • These figures are the local layer alone. Whatever Cleveland and Broadview Heights take sits on top of state, federal and payroll tax. Those three are the same wherever in Ohio you work, so putting them in would bury the difference this page is about.
  • The dollar figures rest on one assumed salary, sixty thousand. Double your pay and they double. Halve it and they halve. What stays put is the relationship between what Broadview Heights charges and what Cleveland gives back, which is the part worth carrying away.
  • Two misreadings bracket the correct answer and both are common. Ohio does not simply add the two rates together, which would overstate the charge; nor does it apply only the higher of them, which is Pennsylvania's rule and would understate it wherever the credit is partial. Broadview Heights taxes what is earned within its boundaries, Cleveland taxes its residents on everything, and Cleveland then credits some, all or none of what Broadview Heights collected. The credit is the entire mechanism, and it is set by Cleveland rather than by the state.
  • The credit rule modeled here is Cleveland's own, adopted by ordinance and amendable by Cleveland alone. Ohio's uniform framework governs definitions, filing and withholding; it does not compel any municipality to credit tax paid to another. A council vote in Cleveland can therefore change every figure on this page without anything altering in Broadview Heights or in state law, which is a materially different exposure from a rate set by statute.
  • Ohio school district income tax is a separate levy from municipal income tax and is excluded from these figures. It is imposed by school district of residence rather than by municipality, it is unaffected by employment in Broadview Heights, and no municipal credit applies to it. A resident of Cleveland whose school district levies one owes it in addition to everything shown here, which is why the totals on this page are a municipal position rather than a complete local one.
  • Only municipal income tax is modeled. Ohio's state income tax, federal income tax and payroll taxes all apply in addition and are invariant to the boundary between Cleveland and Broadview Heights, which is precisely why they are excluded: isolating the layer that responds to the commute is the point of the comparison. A complete tax position requires adding them; a comparison of the two locations does not.
  • Dollar figures are computed against a stated reference salary of sixty thousand rather than a municipal wage average, which no published source provides for Ohio municipalities. Both rates and the credit ceiling are proportional to income, so every figure scales linearly: the Cleveland to Broadview Heights differential doubles at twice the salary and halves at half of it, and the rate relationship holds at every level. The one caveat is that whether the ceiling binds at all is itself scale-invariant here, because it too is expressed as a share of income rather than as a fixed dollar cap.

Questions people ask

Do I pay local tax twice — once where I work and once where I live?

You are taxed by both, then given credit for one. Working in Broadview Heights costs about 2%; living in Cleveland costs about 2.5%, reduced by whatever share of the work tax the home city recognizes.

Does working in a different town cost me anything?

Nothing extra. The tax is redirected rather than increased, so this particular crossing costs you no more than working in Cleveland would.

Is this commute common enough for the numbers to mean anything?

592 workers make this journey — enough to be published, but not a major corridor. The tax rules do not depend on how many people travel a route, so the figures hold regardless; the count only tells you how typical this pairing is.

How does a resident credit allocate liability between two municipalities?

Both jurisdictions assert a claim: Broadview Heights on the basis of work location at about 2%, Cleveland on residence at about 2.5%. The residence municipality grants a credit for tax paid to the work municipality, commonly capped as a share of income. Net liability is the residence tax less that credit, floored at zero, plus the work tax.

Why is the marginal cost of this crossing zero?

Marginal liability from working outside the residence jurisdiction is zero on this route. The crossing alters the distribution of revenue between jurisdictions but not the employee's total. ⚠️ This is route-specific and does not generalise to other pairs in the same dataset.

What is the measurement basis for a route of this size?

Route volume is 592 workers per Census LODES, above the publication floor but below the dataset's upper quartile. Liability is determined by jurisdictional rates and residence rules alone; commuter volume has no bearing on it and is reported only as context.