Hempfield Township to Greensburg

Everyday commuter cars and a bus crossing a steel river bridge beside an American city.

Pennsylvania Act 32 local earned income tax · MERCER to WESTMORELAND County · tax year 2026

Home rate

1%

Hempfield Township, residents

Work rate

0%

Greensburg, non-residents

You pay

1%

the higher of the two

Cost of the commute

$0

a year, above the home rate

What this commute costs you

no extra local tax
$
Local tax total
$600
one rate, not two, for the year
Because of the commute
$0
above working in Hempfield Township
Slack before it costs
$600
Greensburg could take this much more first

Hempfield Township already charges its residents more than Greensburg charges commuters, so the home rate governs and the job adds nothing at all. You pay the solid bar only — Pennsylvania charges the higher of the two rates, never their sum. Local earned income tax only; state, federal and payroll tax apply on top.

What this commute actually costs

  • Good news for this commute. Working in Greensburg costs you nothing extra. Hempfield Township charges residents about 1%, at least as much as Greensburg asks of people who work there but live elsewhere. The higher rate wins, so your home rate is simply the rate. That is $600 a year, wherever you work.
  • Few other routes into Greensburg appear in this data, so there is little to compare at that end. The other direction has plenty. Hempfield Township sends workers to 5 places, and this is number 2 by size.
  • For the Hempfield Township to Greensburg commute the residence governs. Hempfield Township's resident rate of about 1% equals or exceeds Greensburg's non-resident rate, so Pennsylvania's greater-of test resolves to the resident rate and the effective burden is about 1%, or $600 at the reference salary. The workplace adds nothing; the entire amount is remitted to the residence. This is the majority outcome and the one most commuters need confirmed.
  • Greensburg draws few recorded inflows, so cross-origin comparison is thin at the destination end. The origin is better covered: Hempfield Township appears as the home municipality for 5 tracked destinations, of which this ranks 2 by worker count.

Where the money goes

A $75,000 salary

  • Federal income tax$7,670
  • Social Security and Medicare$5,738
  • State income tax$2,303
  • Yours$59,290
Federal income tax10.23%$7,670
Social Security and Medicare7.65%$5,738
State income tax3.07%$2,303
Yours79.05%$59,290

The arithmetic, side by side

Hempfield Township to Greensburg rate comparison
If you worked in Hempfield Township$600
Working in Greensburg$600
Difference$0

On a reference salary of $60,000 a year. The local tax is flat, so every figure scales with your own pay.

What this page does not cover

  • To be explicit, since the arrangement invites confusion. The rates for Hempfield Township and Greensburg are not stacked. Pennsylvania takes the larger one. What is collected then gets divided between the two municipalities. That division does not change what comes out of your pay.
  • Only one tax is on this page. It is the local earned income tax that Hempfield Township and Greensburg levy. State tax, federal tax and Social Security all still apply. All three are the same wherever in Pennsylvania you work.
  • All the dollar amounts rest on one assumed salary. It is stated rather than measured, because nobody publishes average pay for Hempfield Township. The local tax is a flat percentage. Scale every figure to your own salary and the Greensburg conclusion holds.
  • Two practical cautions. Postal addresses and taxing boundaries do not always agree. Your post may say Hempfield Township while your taxing municipality is a different one. Pennsylvania publishes an official lookup to settle it. The same caution applies at the Greensburg end. Philadelphia is a special case too, with its own wage tax.
  • The two rates applicable to a Hempfield Township–Greensburg commute are alternatives, not addends. The statute fixes the employee's liability at the greater of them and then apportions the proceeds, with the residence receiving up to its own rate and the excess passing to the work location. The apportionment is fiscally significant to the municipalities and immaterial to the worker.
  • The scope here is the municipal earned income tax alone. State, federal and payroll taxes are unaffected by the choice between Hempfield Township and Greensburg and are therefore outside the model. A total tax position requires adding them; a comparison of the two locations does not.
  • Monetary figures derive from a single stated salary assumption; no published wage series covers Pennsylvania municipalities such as Hempfield Township. The flat structure of the local tax means the Greensburg comparison is scale-invariant, so the rate difference rather than the dollar difference is the transferable result.
  • Two caveats bear on accuracy. First, postal addresses and municipal taxing boundaries diverge frequently in Pennsylvania, so a Hempfield Township address should be confirmed against the DCED municipal lookup before relying on the Hempfield Township rate. Second, Philadelphia administers its wage tax outside this framework, with its own resident and non-resident rates and its own credit arrangements, so any pairing touching it should be checked against the city's own schedule.

Questions people ask

Do I pay local tax twice — once where I work and once where I live?

No — you pay the higher of the two rates and never the sum. Hempfield Township levies about 1% on residents and Greensburg levies about 0% on people who work there; whichever is larger is what you owe, and your employer withholds it.

Does working in a different town cost me anything?

On this route, nothing. You owe exactly what you would have owed working at home — the boundary is real on a map and invisible on your pay stub, which is not true of every pair of towns here.

Which town's rate am I actually paying?

Hempfield Township's, because it is the higher of the two. Where you live sets the rate on this route, so working across the boundary does not raise what you owe — it only changes who collects it.

Is this a common enough commute to be worth modeling?

1,609 workers make it. The pairing comes from federal commuting data rather than from guesswork, and thin routes are excluded rather than estimated.

The town I work in charges nothing — does that help me?

Working somewhere untaxed leaves the residence claim untouched: Hempfield Township still levies about 1% on you.

How does Pennsylvania's local earned income tax law allocate liability between two districts?

Pennsylvania's local earned income tax law assigns the higher of the residence rate (about 1%) and the non-resident work rate (about 0%); liabilities are never summed. The employer withholds at the governing rate and remits through the work district's collector, which then distributes to the residence district.

Why is the marginal cost of this crossing zero?

Marginal liability from working outside the residence jurisdiction is zero on this route. The crossing alters the distribution of revenue between jurisdictions but not the employee's total. ⚠️ This is route-specific and does not generalise to other pairs in the same dataset.

Which district's rate governs on this route?

The residence rate equals or exceeds the work district's non-resident rate and therefore governs. Working outside the residence district does not increase employee liability on this route; it affects only inter-district distribution.

What is the basis for including this route?

Route volume is 1,609 workers, sourced from Census LODES origin-destination data. Pairs below the publication threshold are excluded rather than imputed, so page existence reflects measured commuting volume.

What is the effect of a zero work-district rate?

A zero work-district rate eliminates the source-based claim but leaves residence-based liability intact at about 1%. Residence liability is unaffected by where earnings are sourced.