Dietitians and Nutritionists in Washington
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$68,079
after federal, FICA and Washington tax
Tax takes
$16,141
19.2% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$62,710
Washington costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Washington — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$84,220
Kept after tax
$68,079
Worth in national money
$62,710
State rank
5
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Pay for dietitians and nutritionists is strong here. Washington's middle earner gets $84,220, putting the state 5 of 51 — about 10.24% ahead of the national figure.
- Ordinary, locally speaking. Dietitians and nutritionists ranks 169 among 493 occupations Washington publishes pay for.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $84,220 the take-home is $68,079. But Washington costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $62,710 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $85,170, because the best-paid pull it up.
- For dietitians and nutritionists, Washington sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $84,220, ranking 5 of 51 and running about 10.24% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
- Position 169 of 493 in Washington places dietitians and nutritionists in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and Washington income tax is $68,079 for dietitians and nutritionists, from $84,220. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $62,710. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $85,170 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Dietitians and Nutritionists
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $62,100 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $84,220 |
| Top tenth earn over | $108,010 |
| This salary | $84,220 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Washington | $68,079 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $68,079 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$7,348 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $84,220 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$10,150 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 109 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Treat $84,220 as a midpoint for Washington, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $62,100 and the ninetieth is $108,010 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
- In Washington the take-home figure of $68,079, from $84,220, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 169 of 493 occupations here.
- One number stands for prices across all of Washington, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $62,710, the adjusted value of that $84,220 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 169 of 493 in the state.
- The Washington median of $84,220 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $62,100 to $108,010. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
- Take-home for Washington is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $68,079 from $84,220. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 169 of 493 locally.
- Price deflation uses one statewide parity for Washington, so $62,710 — the adjusted value of that $84,220 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 169 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
Less than you might expect. The bottom tenth earn $62,100 and the top tenth $108,010, so most people doing this work in Washington sit within a fairly tight band.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. Washington costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $62,710 rather than its face figure.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $68,079 survives, because Washington levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Can I compare this job across every state?
All 51 jurisdictions report this work, which makes the ranking a like-for-like one.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($62,100 to $108,010) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Washington rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $62,710 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $68,079 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.