Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists in Washington
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$67,769
after federal, FICA and Washington tax
Tax takes
$16,011
19.1% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$62,424
Washington costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Washington — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$83,780
Kept after tax
$67,769
Worth in national money
$62,424
State rank
10
of 47 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Pay for zoologists and wildlife biologists is strong here. Washington's middle earner gets $83,780, putting the state 10 of 47 — about 9.12% ahead of the national figure.
- Ordinary, locally speaking. Zoologists and wildlife biologists ranks 171 among 493 occupations Washington publishes pay for.
- Costs eat into it here. Of $83,780, tax leaves $67,769 — and because Washington is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $62,424 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $91,970, since top earners drag the number up.
- For zoologists and wildlife biologists, Washington sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $83,780, ranking 10 of 47 and running about 9.12% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
- Position 171 of 493 in Washington places zoologists and wildlife biologists in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
- After tax, $67,769 remains from the Washington median of $83,780 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $62,424 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $91,970 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $62,070 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $83,780 |
| Top tenth earn over | $129,850 |
| This salary | $83,780 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Washington | $67,769 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $67,769 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$7,315 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $83,780 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$10,104 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 109 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Half the people doing this work in Washington earn less than $83,780. The published range is $62,070 up to $129,850, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
- One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Washington's $67,769, worked from $83,780. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 171 of 493.
- Two cautions on $62,424, the adjusted value of that $83,780 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Washington. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 171 of 493 locally.
- Reported values are medians; for zoologists and wildlife biologists in Washington the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $62,070 to $129,850. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
- The Washington take-home of $67,769, on $83,780 for work ranking 171 of 493 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 171 of 493 in the state.
- This $62,424 adjusted figure, worked from $83,780, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 171 of 493 in the state. The occupation ranks 171 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $91,970, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
The label is broader than the work. From $62,070 at the bottom tenth to $129,850 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. Washington costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $62,424 rather than its face figure.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Less than people assume. $67,769 of this wage reaches your account, because Washington takes no income tax from wages — but federal tax, Social Security and Medicare still apply exactly as they do everywhere else.
Why is this job missing from some states?
A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 47 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $91,970. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($62,070) and the ninetieth ($129,850) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $62,424 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $67,769 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 47 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.