Property Appraisers and Assessors in Washington
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$67,720
after federal, FICA and Washington tax
Tax takes
$15,990
19.1% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$62,379
Washington costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Washington — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$83,710
Kept after tax
$67,720
Worth in national money
$62,379
State rank
6
of 50 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- This is a good state for the work. Washington pays this job a middle wage of $83,710, ranking 6 of 50 states and sitting about 23.18% above the national middle.
- Middle of the local pack. Of 493 occupations Washington reports figures for, this is number 172.
- Washington is an expensive state, and the adjusted figure shows it. From $83,710 the take-home is $67,720; in national-average money that behaves like $62,379. The average comes to $87,310, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
- Washington's median for property appraisers and assessors is $83,710, about 23.18% above the national figure and 6 of 50 states reporting. Whether that premium reaches the worker depends on the two adjustments below, which is the part a wage table cannot tell you.
- In Washington's occupational distribution, property appraisers and assessors sits at 172 of 493 — neither quartile. This local position is what a resident compares against, and it is determined by the state's own labor market rather than by national patterns for this occupation.
- Take-home for property appraisers and assessors in Washington, on $83,710, is $67,720; deflated by the state's price level, $62,379. ⚠️ The deflator is statewide, so it understates the erosion in the state's metropolitan areas and overstates it outside them. At $87,310 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Property Appraisers and Assessors
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $53,310 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $83,710 |
| Top tenth earn over | $121,680 |
| This salary | $83,710 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Washington | $67,720 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $67,720 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$7,310 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $83,710 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$10,097 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 109 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Treat $83,710 as a midpoint for Washington, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $53,310 and the ninetieth is $121,680 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
- One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Washington's $67,720, worked from $83,710. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 172 of 493.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $62,379 uses one figure for the whole of Washington. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 493 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 172.
- The Washington median of $83,710 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $53,310 to $121,680. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
- The Washington take-home of $67,720, on $83,710 for work ranking 172 of 493 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 172 of 493 in the state.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $62,379, worked from $83,710, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Washington address, on work sitting at 172 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $87,310 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
One title, many jobs. The lowest tenth take $53,310, the highest tenth $121,680, and what separates them is experience, employer and what exactly the role does.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. Washington costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $62,379 rather than its face figure.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $67,720 survives, because Washington levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Why is this job missing from some states?
The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 50 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $87,310. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($53,310) and the ninetieth ($121,680) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $62,379 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $67,720 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.