Healthcare Social Workers in New Hampshire
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$63,886
after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax
Tax takes
$14,374
18.4% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$60,644
New Hampshire costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in New Hampshire — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$78,260
Kept after tax
$63,886
Worth in national money
$60,644
State rank
10
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- This is a good state for the work. New Hampshire pays healthcare social workers a middle wage of $78,260, ranking 10 of 51 states and sitting about 15.29% above the national middle.
- Ordinary, locally speaking. Healthcare social workers ranks 147 among 488 occupations New Hampshire publishes pay for.
- Costs eat into it here. Of $78,260, tax leaves $63,886 — and because New Hampshire is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $60,644 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $80,160, since top earners drag the number up.
- New Hampshire's median for healthcare social workers is $78,260, about 15.29% above the national figure and 10 of 51 states reporting. Whether that premium reaches the worker depends on the two adjustments below, which is the part a wage table cannot tell you.
- Position 147 of 488 in New Hampshire places healthcare social workers in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
- After tax, $63,886 remains from the New Hampshire median of $78,260 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $60,644 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $80,160 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Healthcare Social Workers
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $60,200 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $78,260 |
| Top tenth earn over | $98,930 |
| This salary | $78,260 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in New Hampshire | $63,886 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $63,886 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$5,099 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $78,260 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$7,043 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 105 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of healthcare social workers in New Hampshire earn under $78,260 and half over. The published range runs $60,200 at the tenth percentile to $98,930 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- In New Hampshire the take-home figure of $63,886, from $78,260, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 147 of 488 occupations here.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $60,644 uses one figure for the whole of New Hampshire. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 488 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 147.
- Figures are distribution medians for healthcare social workers in New Hampshire, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $60,200 to $98,930; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Take-home for New Hampshire is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $63,886 from $78,260. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 147 of 488 locally.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $60,644, worked from $78,260, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular New Hampshire address, on work sitting at 147 of 488 locally.
Questions people ask
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
The range here is narrow. From $60,200 at the bottom tenth to $98,930 at the top, pay for this work clusters rather than spreads.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $60,644 of national purchasing power.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Less than people assume. $63,886 of this wage reaches your account, because New Hampshire takes no income tax from wages — but federal tax, Social Security and Medicare still apply exactly as they do everywhere else.
Can I compare this job across every state?
This occupation is published everywhere — all 51 of them — so comparing states measures real differences rather than gaps in the data.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($60,200 to $98,930) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to New Hampshire rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $60,644 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $63,886 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.