Nursing Instructors and Teachers, Postsecondary in New Hampshire

Books, colored pencils and a globe in a bright classroom.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$63,921

after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax

Tax takes

$14,389

18.4% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$60,678

New Hampshire costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$78,310

Kept after tax

$63,921

Worth in national money

$60,678

State rank

34

of 51 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Middling, nationally. New Hampshire pays this job around $78,310 at the midpoint, 34 of 51 states. The interesting numbers on this page are the two below it.
  • Ordinary, locally speaking. This job ranks 146 among 488 occupations New Hampshire publishes pay for.
  • The wage here flatters the reality. From $78,310 the take-home is $63,921. But New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $60,678 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $81,420, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • For nursing instructors and teachers, postsecondary the New Hampshire median is $78,310, ranking 34 of 51 states reporting. Mid-band nominal positions are the ones most frequently reordered by the adjustments, because no large wage premium exists to absorb a state's tax or price level.
  • Position 146 of 488 in New Hampshire places nursing instructors and teachers, postsecondary in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
  • Retained pay after federal, FICA and New Hampshire income tax is $63,921 for nursing instructors and teachers, postsecondary, from $78,310. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $60,678. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $81,420 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Nursing Instructors and Teachers, Postsecondary

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$63,100
Half earn under$78,310
Top tenth earn over$102,870
This salary$78,310

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in New Hampshire$63,921
Take-home in Texas$63,921
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$5,102

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $78,310$71,263
$71,263in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$78,310
You could take a cut of−$7,047
Prices in Texas97 vs 105

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $78,310 as a midpoint for New Hampshire, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $63,100 and the ninetieth is $102,870 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • That $63,921 take-home in New Hampshire comes from $78,310. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 146 of 488.
  • Two cautions on $60,678, the adjusted value of that $78,310 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of New Hampshire. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 146 of 488 locally.
  • The New Hampshire median of $78,310 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $63,100 to $102,870. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • Retained pay of $63,921, from $78,310, assumes a single New Hampshire filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 146 of 488 locally, and the state ranks 34 of 51 for it.
  • This $60,678 adjusted figure, worked from $78,310, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 146 of 488 in the state. The occupation ranks 146 of 488 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $81,420, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.

How much does pay for this job actually vary?

Less than you might expect. The bottom tenth earn $63,100 and the top tenth $102,870, so most people doing this work in New Hampshire sit within a fairly tight band.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

Not on its own. Prices in New Hampshire run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $60,678 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

Less than people assume. $63,921 of this wage reaches your account, because New Hampshire takes no income tax from wages — but federal tax, Social Security and Medicare still apply exactly as they do everywhere else.

Can I compare this job across every state?

Yes for this one. Pay is published in all 51 jurisdictions, so a state-to-state comparison here rests on the same survey everywhere rather than on a patchwork.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in New Hampshire is $81,420. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?

The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($63,100 to $102,870) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to New Hampshire rather than a national figure.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $60,678 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $63,921 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Is this occupation's state coverage complete?

State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.